I’m surprised that nobody has mentioned how market specific the rent/own debate can be. When I worked in Newport Beach, I never even considered buying. Rent was expensive, but my equivalent mortgage payment wouldn’t buy anything within 30 miles.
Here in central Austin, buying is VERY tempting. Housing prices didn’t really bubble and burst like other markets, but our rental rates have gone up more than 10% per year since 2009. There is a massive inflow of renters of all income levels. The high end stuff will have turnover, but the lower end stuff doesn’t - the hipsters and musicians can afford the rent payment, but sadly they can never save enough for the down payment. Combine that with 30,000 students looking for off campus housing and techies getting relocated from CA and you have a good market.
I can buy a 1960’s 2000sqft house for around 250-300k. Right now a 225k mortgage costs you a $1000/month payment, plus around $600 in escrows. Add $200 per month for repairs. So all in, you’re at 21k per year in cash outflows.
Then you rent out a room to a buddy or random craigslister for $600 per month easy. After your interest savings, your outflow is already down to 11k. If you assume that over the long term you will get your principal back and about half of your repair expenses go towards property value, your expense is down to $5,700, or around $475 per month.
Living in a house here with a roommate is probably $800 per person. Living by yourself somewhere is tough to find for under $1000.
If you’re liquid enough, you could potentially rent out the entire thing and make it cash flow. If you buy it as a partnership you might pay a little more in interest, but you can depreciate it $7k per year, and take a tax loss. I’m not in a bracket to fully take advantage of that, but houses are a good way to build wealth over time if you don’t overextend yourself.
I mentioned the location specific nature via the “space market” comment. This will determine rents, and thusly house pricing, which is used to determine new development, which feeds into the space market, which determines rents. Boom.
I know my brother went from a small apartment to owning a house/land with 2x the square feet. His monthly payments were cut in half. He just found a bankruptcy and put 8,000ish into paint and simple repairs
Bchad….well, you do it assuming a margin of safety right? so yes you’re right ,its extremely complex when you put it into a math form (not quantum physics type math but hard enough).
lots of the assumptions you have you assume away….take conservative measures like min housing price increases and reasonable rates inflation and you should have a rough idea…..
to me when i found out it cost me the same to rent and buy, it was a no brainer …..(maybe i’m wrong here)….
what’s the expected rate of return on your condo vs the expected rate of return of investing your downpayment???
the opportunity cost of the down payment is the trickiest of all especially since i bought in March 2009. i would use 3.5% for the equivalent of a no risk investment over a 5 year period.
it would be nice to think that i could have earned 2X-3x my money from my downpayment as that was my results investing during that period but that is not realistic. in the end my real estate appreciated somewhat as well.
in all likelihood, i made out better buying than renting for sure. at least that is how i look at it. renting was 1400-1500/month (albeit at a nicer pplace) whereas my mortgage+fees/taxes came to roughly 1300……
I am seriously thinking about the Atlanta market, a lot of nice houses are going for $70-110k which is peanuts in comparison to NY. If I put 50% down, I can have a house that’s paid off in 5-7 years!
I am seriously thinking about the Atlanta market, a lot of nice houses are going for $70-110k which is peanuts in comparison to NY. If I put 50% down, I can have a house that’s paid off in 5-7 years!
Why pay it off when you can get financing so cheap?
I am seriously thinking about the Atlanta market, a lot of nice houses are going for $70-110k which is peanuts in comparison to NY. If I put 50% down, I can have a house that’s paid off in 5-7 years!
Why pay it off when you can get financing so cheap?
Why not? It’s just another liability on the balance sheet. Instead of worrying about making month to month payments, I extinguish the debt early. That’s what I did when I financed my car. Paid it off early, saved the excess funds and went nuts in Vegas.
wouldn’t it be better to have the payments, and use that “pay off” money to invest? Isn’t that the whole lesson of present value theory? assuming that you can get a return higher than the rate you are borrowing at? which is highly likely for loans of 4-6%apr with inflation at 2.5%.
Maybe you are comfortable with that, but I’m not. It’s one thing to face imminent foreclosure, it’s another to have a margin call on your investment account.
I’m with you bpdulog. I hate debt even if it’s cheap. Plus there’s the cashflow benefit once the debt’s paid off. Paying off a car, for example, is a few hundred bucks of cash in my pocket each month. That’s more attractive to me than DCAing into an investment trying to marginally beat out my cost of debt. Personal preference theory.
As a real estate guy, I can tell you there is no such thing as “imminent” foreclosure, at least on the commercial side. It takes forever, then you work out a deal with the bank to pay a quarter of a month’s debt service which pushes it another 4 months. Its ridiculous how propped up the financial system is. For houses, the foreclosure rate basically depends on how much the bank can process, how much loss the bank can take in that quarter, how much bad PR they think they can handle that quarter, etc. The borrower is basically a secondary concern.
Buying a house shouldn’t be a gamble… if you can’t pay your note for 6 months without income, you’re not ready. Investing every bit of liquidity you have in risky assets while trying to cover your cost of borrowing isn’t any different than leveraging up a portfolio of small caps. Not a very good idea.
If your income is “bond-like” however, then I see no significant advantage to short term mortgages over fixed long term. Money is cheap now, and there are tax benefits as mentioned. Once you set aside some rainy day funds in cash, then chances are whatever extra savings you invest in equities will outperform over time.
I saw (I think, maybe some other economist) Shiller on CNBC a few months back. Apparently they’ve done studies on the rate of return of one’s primary residence vs renting. I remembering it being something like in the 6-9% range. It’d be interesting if I Could remember who that was and find the research.
Also, what if you were able to borrow at or under inflation? Would you still pay it off early? I understand the aversion to leverage, but isn’t finance all about the prudent use of leverage.
My coworker is a redneck conservitave pseudo racist sumbitch who think po folks like me need their wordz of wizdum. I may have to go street on his azz.
I looked at it this way when I bought a house. Granted it is very basic numbers, but helped me make the decision to purchase.
Purchase price was 420k, put 10% down, got a 4% 30 year fixed rate. Over the course of the 30 years, assuming I pay no additional amount every month, I will pay a total of about $270k in interest. If I then look at the monthly amount of that, 270k/360 is about $750 a month. Here in Boston, there is no chance of getting rent for that unless I want to live in some slum hole with 2 buddies in southie. Since I am operating under the assumption that I can sell my house for the price I bought it at in 30 years (i know inflation will be raging and this will not happen), then I paid $750 a month to live in my house, not some dump apartment. I realize the $750 is way to basic of a number, as it doesnt include property taxes, insurance, upgrades, utilities and other housing related costs. However, that $270k in interest that I pay, along with taxes are tax deductible, so really my total cost is less. Let’s say I pay the equivalent of $600 a month when the tax advantage portion of interest is factored in, that gives me probably close to $1000 a month in housing related costs that I have to work with to get to $1600 a month, which is what I would be looking for when renting for me and my family.
Granted there are always trade offs between buying and renting. I used to be of the midset that buying was a total and complete waste of money, aso you wind out losing in the long run because of the amount you pay in interest. Now I don’t think that to be the case. I also think there is an intangible aspect of home ownership that personally for me is higher than if I rented.
I do agree now though that financing a house at 4% is great. At first I was going to pre-pay a little bit every month, but I am confident I can make more than 4% a year investing, so I will forgo pre-paying for now.
canadian real estate and us real estate are completely different animals. because of the mortgage interest tax deduction being deductible for landlords but not outright homeowners, it is almost always more affordable to rent. in Canada, you need appreciation of something like 2-3% per year for at least 6 years (no moving) to break-even. this is especially so outside of major cities. for example, i currently rent at $1,200/mth in Waterloo, ON. and to compare with owning a similar house (row of townhouses) sold for $270,000.
With 10% down ($27,000), my mortgage interest would still be $700/mth (assuming 3.5% rate), op cost on $27,000 low risk would be $70 (assuming 3% rate), cost to finance appliances which are included with renting is $200/mth (assuming $20,000 with 10 year life and 8% rate on non-secured LOCs in Canada), condo fees of $200/mth, taxes of $200/mth and additional insurance costs of $40/mth to total $1,410. I am literally saving $210/mth ($2,540/yr) by renting and this doesn’t include any amortization of major projects like a new roof or things of that sort. in canada, because only the landlord has a tax writeoff, you have to make 2-3% for approx. six years to cover a single move (5-6% of house = $15,000 + (6yrs x $2,540)).
^ Given the canadian housing market has been on a tear for 10 years now, getting that 2-3% a year for the next 6 years will be an uphill battle. At best, I see flat returns for the next decade.
I mentioned the location specific nature via the “space market” comment. This will determine rents, and thusly house pricing, which is used to determine new development, which feeds into the space market, which determines rents. Boom.
REITs, please PM for contact details.
Studying With
I know my brother went from a small apartment to owning a house/land with 2x the square feet. His monthly payments were cut in half. He just found a bankruptcy and put 8,000ish into paint and simple repairs
what’s the expected rate of return on your condo vs the expected rate of return of investing your downpayment???
the opportunity cost of the down payment is the trickiest of all especially since i bought in March 2009. i would use 3.5% for the equivalent of a no risk investment over a 5 year period.
it would be nice to think that i could have earned 2X-3x my money from my downpayment as that was my results investing during that period but that is not realistic. in the end my real estate appreciated somewhat as well.
in all likelihood, i made out better buying than renting for sure. at least that is how i look at it. renting was 1400-1500/month (albeit at a nicer pplace) whereas my mortgage+fees/taxes came to roughly 1300……
Studying With
I am seriously thinking about the Atlanta market, a lot of nice houses are going for $70-110k which is peanuts in comparison to NY. If I put 50% down, I can have a house that’s paid off in 5-7 years!
NO EXCUSES
Critique my resume: http://www.razume.com/documents/27593
Like electronic music? Check out my latest mix: http://www.mixcloud.com/bpdulog/mix-5/
Studying With
Why pay it off when you can get financing so cheap?
I second this question
Studying With
Why not? It’s just another liability on the balance sheet. Instead of worrying about making month to month payments, I extinguish the debt early. That’s what I did when I financed my car. Paid it off early, saved the excess funds and went nuts in Vegas.
NO EXCUSES
Critique my resume: http://www.razume.com/documents/27593
Like electronic music? Check out my latest mix: http://www.mixcloud.com/bpdulog/mix-5/
wouldn’t it be better to have the payments, and use that “pay off” money to invest? Isn’t that the whole lesson of present value theory? assuming that you can get a return higher than the rate you are borrowing at? which is highly likely for loans of 4-6%apr with inflation at 2.5%.
Studying With
Maybe you are comfortable with that, but I’m not. It’s one thing to face imminent foreclosure, it’s another to have a margin call on your investment account.
NO EXCUSES
Critique my resume: http://www.razume.com/documents/27593
Like electronic music? Check out my latest mix: http://www.mixcloud.com/bpdulog/mix-5/
I’m with you bpdulog. I hate debt even if it’s cheap. Plus there’s the cashflow benefit once the debt’s paid off. Paying off a car, for example, is a few hundred bucks of cash in my pocket each month. That’s more attractive to me than DCAing into an investment trying to marginally beat out my cost of debt. Personal preference theory.
Studying With
^this. I like sleeping well at night. Please teach me how to invest at 4% risk free too. You don’t gamble with your lunch money.
In Canada, interest is not tax deductible, so you will have to have a return higher than the after-tax borrowing rate.
As a real estate guy, I can tell you there is no such thing as “imminent” foreclosure, at least on the commercial side. It takes forever, then you work out a deal with the bank to pay a quarter of a month’s debt service which pushes it another 4 months. Its ridiculous how propped up the financial system is. For houses, the foreclosure rate basically depends on how much the bank can process, how much loss the bank can take in that quarter, how much bad PR they think they can handle that quarter, etc. The borrower is basically a secondary concern.
Buying a house shouldn’t be a gamble… if you can’t pay your note for 6 months without income, you’re not ready. Investing every bit of liquidity you have in risky assets while trying to cover your cost of borrowing isn’t any different than leveraging up a portfolio of small caps. Not a very good idea.
If your income is “bond-like” however, then I see no significant advantage to short term mortgages over fixed long term. Money is cheap now, and there are tax benefits as mentioned. Once you set aside some rainy day funds in cash, then chances are whatever extra savings you invest in equities will outperform over time.
Studying With
I saw (I think, maybe some other economist) Shiller on CNBC a few months back. Apparently they’ve done studies on the rate of return of one’s primary residence vs renting. I remembering it being something like in the 6-9% range. It’d be interesting if I Could remember who that was and find the research.
Studying With
Also, what if you were able to borrow at or under inflation? Would you still pay it off early? I understand the aversion to leverage, but isn’t finance all about the prudent use of leverage.
do you live below the mason dixon line?
ACEaceAnaltiCalteEquityACEanalticalteequityACE
http://tinyurl.com/axn8cua
aceofheartscapitalmanagement@_____________
+1. So true lol :)
Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here
I looked at it this way when I bought a house. Granted it is very basic numbers, but helped me make the decision to purchase.
Purchase price was 420k, put 10% down, got a 4% 30 year fixed rate. Over the course of the 30 years, assuming I pay no additional amount every month, I will pay a total of about $270k in interest. If I then look at the monthly amount of that, 270k/360 is about $750 a month. Here in Boston, there is no chance of getting rent for that unless I want to live in some slum hole with 2 buddies in southie. Since I am operating under the assumption that I can sell my house for the price I bought it at in 30 years (i know inflation will be raging and this will not happen), then I paid $750 a month to live in my house, not some dump apartment. I realize the $750 is way to basic of a number, as it doesnt include property taxes, insurance, upgrades, utilities and other housing related costs. However, that $270k in interest that I pay, along with taxes are tax deductible, so really my total cost is less. Let’s say I pay the equivalent of $600 a month when the tax advantage portion of interest is factored in, that gives me probably close to $1000 a month in housing related costs that I have to work with to get to $1600 a month, which is what I would be looking for when renting for me and my family.
Granted there are always trade offs between buying and renting. I used to be of the midset that buying was a total and complete waste of money, aso you wind out losing in the long run because of the amount you pay in interest. Now I don’t think that to be the case. I also think there is an intangible aspect of home ownership that personally for me is higher than if I rented.
I do agree now though that financing a house at 4% is great. At first I was going to pre-pay a little bit every month, but I am confident I can make more than 4% a year investing, so I will forgo pre-paying for now.
^+ If after tax cost of interest is < after tax profit from investing, don’t pay it off early. GENERALLY SPEAKING.
Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here
canadian real estate and us real estate are completely different animals. because of the mortgage interest tax deduction being deductible for landlords but not outright homeowners, it is almost always more affordable to rent. in Canada, you need appreciation of something like 2-3% per year for at least 6 years (no moving) to break-even. this is especially so outside of major cities. for example, i currently rent at $1,200/mth in Waterloo, ON. and to compare with owning a similar house (row of townhouses) sold for $270,000.
With 10% down ($27,000), my mortgage interest would still be $700/mth (assuming 3.5% rate), op cost on $27,000 low risk would be $70 (assuming 3% rate), cost to finance appliances which are included with renting is $200/mth (assuming $20,000 with 10 year life and 8% rate on non-secured LOCs in Canada), condo fees of $200/mth, taxes of $200/mth and additional insurance costs of $40/mth to total $1,410. I am literally saving $210/mth ($2,540/yr) by renting and this doesn’t include any amortization of major projects like a new roof or things of that sort. in canada, because only the landlord has a tax writeoff, you have to make 2-3% for approx. six years to cover a single move (5-6% of house = $15,000 + (6yrs x $2,540)).
^ Given the canadian housing market has been on a tear for 10 years now, getting that 2-3% a year for the next 6 years will be an uphill battle. At best, I see flat returns for the next decade.
Pages