The driverless car dilemma

[system]

@Sweep_the_Leg

Not responding to your obvious trolling has nothing to do with you providing irrefutable proof on any topic, ever.

Ah, because critical thinking is “trolling” on "Analyst"Forum.

Actually the pattern I notice is that you almost NEVER post anything of substance, just one-liners.

[Analti_Calte_Equity]

@purealpha

@Sweep_the_Leg

Not responding to your obvious trolling has nothing to do with you providing irrefutable proof on any topic, ever.

Ah, because critical thinking is “trolling” on "Analyst"Forum.

Actually the pattern I notice is that you almost NEVER post anything of substance, just one-liners.

at least his one liners have truth

[onlysimon]

@Analti\_Calte\_Equity

A driverless car is about to run over ten people, and there is not enough time to for the car to stop. The only the way the car can avoid killing the pedestrians is to swerve into a wall, which will probably kill one or more of the vehicle’s passengers.

it didn’t happen. it was a blue truck against a blue sky. the question will be answered by allowing only orange trucks.

people are already not allowed to walk in the road. this issue was resolved 100yrs ago.

[geo]

^ Yes, pedestrians cannot cross the street… Huh?

[BarbaraArnold17]

i think it’s still going to be a really long time until we see driverless cars all over the place… but I do have confidence they will be safer than human operated cars…

[Analti_Calte_Equity]

@BarbaraArnold17

i think it’s still going to be a really long time until we see driverless cars all over the place… but I do have confidence they will be safer than human operated cars…

and we meet again what we see so many times in the car industry safety vs cost how much will it cost to build the many components and infrastructure of such a seamlessly safe auto-driver configuration setup … a lot