I used the Schweser Kaplan study materials for L1. I found their Qbank questions to be very easy (too easy). So I purchased the UpperMark Qbank for my final review. I went through all of the questions in both test banks. The difficulty level of the actual test questions were more comparable to UM than Kaplan. I did find some areas that UM covered, but Kaplan did not. I found that UM covered more material, but Kaplan was easier to read and get through. I will probably do the same thing for L2. Hope this helps!
Agree with the above regarding the question banks. I’d recommend Uppermark.
I note from your title you have passed CFA Level III. If you are a Charter holder, do not forget about CAIA’s new stackable credential programme.
For level 1 I used Schweser and also for level 2, but what Lucille2009 says is true, I found a little to easy in comparison with the real exam Schweser QBank questions. I have never used UM though.
I can’t talk about Schweser for CAIA as I have only used it for CFA Level 1 and CFA Level 2 and found it to be good. However, I was very disappointed with Uppermark. I found the lecturer to be badly prepared and after spending 9 hours on Topic 2, I realised that I did not want to go on with Uppermark. However, don’t bother trying to get a refund. Not only have they made that impossible, but they do not respond to any email communication, they expect you to communicate via post.
use the study guide
Join the world’s largest online community of CFA, CAIA and FRM candidates.
No thanks, I don't want to increase my probability of passing.