Geometric mean vs arithmetic mean

Fund
Arithmetic Mean (%)
Geometric Mean (%)

SLASX
2.64
−0.65

PRFDX
4.31
1.59

“The difference between the geometric mean returns of the two funds (2.24%) is greater than the difference between the arithmetic mean returns of the two funds (1.67%). How should the analyst interpret these results?”

Taken directly from reading 8 - the paragraph after describes that geometric is compound growth.

I do understand that the larger the difference between the SLASX Arithmetic and geometric means the greater the variability.

Not clear about the significance of “greater variability between: arithmetic mean of two different samples vs geometric mean of two different samples”.

Thanks

The best just got better. Schweser's upgraded content and redesigned study platform are exactly what you need to pass the Level I exam. Save 10% when you preorder a Premium Package for a limited time.

Arithmetic mean is not time weighted and Geo mean is.

For Arithmetic mean return earned in year 1 and year 2 have same weights where as in geometric mean return earned in year 1 would have lager weights than year 2 because we have held that asset longer than year 2.