The study books say that if a company is selling their A/R to an SPV, that would reduce assets and liabilities. The opposite is also true, if we include off-balance sheet financing, an asset and a liability should be created, results in increased leverage ratios.
This is what I can’t understand—if we’re selling A/R into an SPV and we’re receiving cash, assets would remain the same right? Our A/R line item would decrease, but cash would increase by the same amount. So why are the books telling me assets would decrease if we sold A/R or increase if we brought A/R back onto the balance sheet?
Where does it say that assets decrease? Pretty sure they increase when you consolidate, because you bring the A/R back onto balance sheet, and also keep the cash you got from forming the SPV (and add a liability to your balance sheet to make things balance) So instead of just having A/R, like you would if you hadn’t securitized anything, you have A/R plus cash plus a liability. This confused me because I thought consolidating would just be ‘reversing’ the transaction ie pretending it never happened. But it actually seems to result in something different. Can someone confirm this is right? Thanks
Kikaha, I think you have it right. As I understand it, the transaction is treated as a secured borrowing wich is why you end up with cash,AR AND the debt/liability
Ok I got it now----I just got confused. It seems like if you’re bringing the A/R back on the balance sheet you would be counting assets twice (cash we received from the original sale of the receivables and then the receivables themselves).
right but the 50 addition to cash is viewed as a borrowing. so you now have also a 50 liability. i have not reviwed the material since jan so i culd be wrong
LeaseAPlane borrows $100MM from Giant Bank to buy a plane. They then lease that plane to FlyByNight. They do the same thing 10 times. They then decide they need some cash, so they sell the stream of lease payments to StandAloneCorp. However, LeaseAPlane is still on the hook for the hundreds of millions that they borrowed from Giant Bank to buy the plane, because they were not thinking straight when they structured the initial or post transactions, so when FlyByNight goes chapter 11 and stops making the lease payments, StandAloneCorp can then go after LeaseAPlane for the money owed to its investors. That’s recourse: when a party can go after another for more than the value of whatever collateralized a loan/debt transaction.