# EVA/Economic Profit Vs. Residual Income

Since Economic profit (EVA) is calculated as the NOPAT - \$WACC, isnt it equivalent to the Residual income, which is

Net income - equity charge => NOPAT - After tax Interst - Equity charge => NOPAT -\$WACC

How are they different?

Can anyone help me out…

Make the most of your CFA® Progam prep in one weekend! Join renowned instructors, Peter Olinto, Darren Degraaf & David Hetherington in May for a live, two-day intensive final review class.

Since Economic profit (EVA) is calculated as the NOPAT - \$WACC, isnt it equivalent to the Residual income, which is

Net income - equity charge => NOPAT - After tax Interst - Equity charge => NOPAT -\$WACC

How are they different?

Can anyone help me out…

So two thoughts here (don’t know if they’re right):

1) Net income is not the same as net operating profit after tax.  Net income is post interest and NOPAT is not.  Right?

2) WACC and the equity charge are not the same thing unless the firm is financed 100% with equity.

Anyone have input on this?  Thanks!

Steely Dan wrote:

So two thoughts here (don’t know if they’re right):

1) Net income is not the same as net operating profit after tax.  Net income is post interest and NOPAT is not.  Right?

2) WACC and the equity charge are not the same thing unless the firm is financed 100% with equity.

Anyone have input on this?  Thanks!

1) You’re right. They are NOT the same. NOPAT is EBIT-Taxes, if I remember correctly.

2) Also correct. Your equity charge will be the cost of equity * your beginning book value of equity.

2 ways to calculate residual income. 1 through NOPAT - \$WACC which is equivalent to EVA while the other one is through NI. Projecting the NI and adjusting from it the equity charge. If interest expense is treated similarly i.e. dollar amount & percentage, then both equations should yield the same RI.

This is a game that rewards patience and balance. Think like a man of action and act like a man of thought.

Interest Expenses treated similarly means that the interest expense which is deducted from EBIT is the only interest cost and it also reflects in WACC then RI should be same under both methods. If there is some interest income then both equations might not result in the same RI.

This is a game that rewards patience and balance. Think like a man of action and act like a man of thought.

krazykanuck wrote:

Steely Dan wrote:

So two thoughts here (don’t know if they’re right):

1) Net income is not the same as net operating profit after tax.  Net income is post interest and NOPAT is not.  Right?

2) WACC and the equity charge are not the same thing unless the firm is financed 100% with equity.

Anyone have input on this?  Thanks!

1) You’re right. They are NOT the same. NOPAT is EBIT-Taxes, if I remember correctly.

2) Also correct. Your equity charge will be the cost of equity * your beginning book value of equity.

I think NOPAT is EBIT(1 - tax rate)