I thought these were periodic pension costs, no? I see Total Periodic Pension Cost as: (Ending Funded Status - Beginning Funded Status) - Employer contribution.
Total periodic pension cost can be calculated with two formulas - the first one of my post and the other from your post. Both will lead to the same figure. The second and third formulas are for the amount to be recognized on the IS (periodic pension cost, periodic pension expense, name it as you want).
Total periodic pension cost is recignized in both IS and OCI. Past service cost and plan amendments are the same. They occur when you retrospectively change the conditions of the plan.
I don’t understand how Periodic Pension Cost and Total Periodic Pension Cost can both be recognized on the I/S? Is there two different figures in the I/S ?!?
I’m confused. Can someone highlight which pension item is recorded on income statement and which is record on other comprehensive income for IFRS vs GAAP?
I realise that “pension expense” is that portion of cost recognised in the income statement, and that “TOTAL periodic pension cost” is the over all cost from both income statement and OCI commonly calculated with the old “ending funded status - employer contributions - beginning funded status”
…but what if the question just asks for “periodic pension cost” - what would you be inclined to include? The total figure? Just that figure recognised on the income statement?
There can be more variations and I think they’re all correct. The good thing is they won’t give you misleading question regarding names. On the exam if they ask me for “periodic pension cost” I would calculate first the expense that should be recognized in IS and if it doesn’t match one of the answers I’ll calculate the total sum.