Good point hei.so. Interestingly it doesn’t make the distinction in asking for either historical or analytical.
Re-reading the text, it does say that:
“Although Babb, Downing, and Lockwood believe that future expected fund returns can be based on the historical average (as shown in Exhibit 1), future annual volatility cannot.”
So I guess that should have been my prompt to not use the annual fund return volatility and instead look at the historical distribution.
I first computed the analytical VaR using given return, standard deviation, and z=1.65. The number was not in the multiple choices so I switched to the historical return distribution table to find out the return corresponding to cumulative bottom 5% probability. This led me to a number which was fortunately in the multiple choices.
Does anybody understand why we need to use historical return distribution table for this question?