Hopefully someone will be able to shed some light on this.
According to the CFA’s website on answering L3 written questions and I quote; " Points are awarded for direct answers. Points are not awarded for general knowledge that does not address the question."
However, reviewing the past L3 written questions and guideline answers, some level of general knowledge statements appear to be expected.
I don’t want to unintentionally violate CFA’s rules on disclosing questions, so I’ll just couch it in general terms here but if someone can confirm that we are allowed to openly discuss questions/answers posted on CFA’s website, I’ll put in more information.
So in general terms, say the question is: “State 2 benefits of X”.
I would expect the answer to be along the lines of: Benefit 1 is blah blah blah; Benefit 2 is blah blah blah.
However the guideline answer puts it as: "X is provides definition of X". Benefit 1 is blah blah blah; Benefit 2 is blah blah blah.
Personally I regard the definition of X to be general knowledge that does not answer the question as the question does not ask what X is. Is this a case of guideline answers giving more than is strictly required?