# Cobb-Douglas

The Schweser text states:

Empiricial studies suggest it is reasonable to assume constant returns to scale, any given change in capital or labor (for example, from 2% to 3% or 5% to 6%) has a linear effect on output.

I thought capital and labor both have diminishing returns to scale due to the elasticity of capital and labor which sum to 1. Can someone clarify this?

Share this

# Study together. Pass together.

Join the world's largest online community of CFA, CAIA and FRM candidates.

Studying With

Cobb-Douglas is constant to scale.

Linear doesn’t mean 1:1 increase. For example, if alpha = 0.4, if capital increased from 2% to 3%, we would expect output to increase by 0.4 * (3% - 2%), or 0.4%

But it does mean that the slope is constant, which is inconsistent with diminishing marginal returns.

Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.

Financial Exam Help 123: The place to get help for the CFA® exams

http://financialexamhelp123.com/

The original function is Y = A K

^{alpha}L^{beta}=> Alpha and Beta are different.After that, they assume constant returns to sale, substitute Beta = Alpha -1 and take the natural logarithm of both sides to get the growth formula. Therefore, in the exercise, it is always assumed constant returns to scale.

Unless

α=β= 0.5.I believe that you mean

β=1−α.Simplify the complicated side; don't complify the simplicated side.

Financial Exam Help 123: The place to get help for the CFA® exams

http://financialexamhelp123.com/

Studying With

Mark