An answer for why the foundation had an above average ability to take risk was due to the fact the support to the youth center wasn’t legally binding and more of a goal. Additionally, keeping the tax exempt status is more of a goal as well. These 2 things result in an above average ability to take risk.
My question is - Since the CFAI used this rationale in the 2018 exam, can I use this same reason regardless of any case facts if we get a question about foundations and their ability to take risk?