Just wanted to get some thoughts… Do you think it worth going through Level 2 material in order to be kinda prepared that Level 3 will throw at us or it is nothing but wasting time? In other words, is Level 3 CFAI books are sufficient to prepare without referring to materials for Level 2 ?
Yes, everything you need to know for L3 is in the L3 curriculum, but it helps a ton if you went through the L2 curriculum. Many parts of L2 and L3 material build off of the previous level.
Some people skip low weight topics such as derivatives, alt. investments, or economics on L2. If you do so, going through these topics in the L3 curriculum will be a pain in the a$$.
I think you’re missing the point here. The question was that do you need to review L2 material to pass L3. I said that all you need for L3 is in the L3 material, but it is helpful if you went through the L2 curriculum. If you did not, it might be helpful to glance over those topics in L2 because some L3 stuff builds off of L2 stuff. Whether you skipped all low weight topics or just one doesn’t really matter.
Waste of time in my view. L3 material is all you need to pass and you can review anything you have forgot as it comes up. L3 obviously builds on previous levels but the focus is different. L2 content is deeper as well, L3 is more practical application and higher level.
Did that in L1 and L2. In those two levels i ensured that i studied at least a total of 70% of the subjects. for L3, i skipped GIPS and i totally regret it.