I am giving myself a 60% fail/40% pass probability. I left 10% of the am section unanswered due to time and the stupid first question. The ones I answered, I feel like I can get 70% on those. I feel that I killed the PM section but you never really know. All it takes is 2 wrong questions per section to move you down a class.
I only read ethics once and that was from the Kaplan material. No matter how hard I study for those questions I always find them to be a toss-up, so I decided to go with the most conservative answer approach. If that works out, I am praying that my pm helps make up for a lackluster AM.
I left 3 complete questions unaswered. i searched the forum snd there is one (zerobeta) or two guy who passed exam missing 3 full questions, there are many who left 2 questions and still passed. It depends how well you score on the answers you wrote and on PM.
I didn’t feel bad after exam but worried now that I have made mistakes in AM like writing on wrong boxes, if I fail it’ll be close and hard to take if it was a result of those types of errors which can be easily made in such a time pressured exam
I found that question odd too but thought it came from GIPS that I didnt have the time to even touch. Funny thing is I found ethics easy with nearly all C’s as answers. As someone rightly said, its 10-80%. Ethics = No guarantee whatsoever
It was my first time as well. I just read the questions first (on the AM) and know what to look for based on the topic/subject of the vignette. Circle/make a note of the stuff to use in your answers, then its just a copy/paste essentially plus your quick explanation as to why that specific thing is relevant. The AM was incredibly straight forward in that regard. Much easier than PM in my opinion, especially first two item sets on PM…ugh.
This. I underline any numerical figure, risk ability/willingness-focused statements, liquidity requirement, or time horizon figure. Then I checkmark them as used (or N/A if not applicable). I also do this for ethics, underlying the key points and to distill the question. It really helps, I think. Especially for return calcs and risk statements.
Im a retaker from last year and I feel that the second time around made me way more efficient than my first attempt even though I thought I was well prepared last year. This years AM was much easier than last years AM in my opinion. Ethics section was way easier than last year on the PM. My PM matrix last year was all topics over 70 except for ethics and I failed band 7. This year I feel like my PM matrix will be all topics over 70 and I think Im getting at least 65 to 80% on the AM. Overall I feel very confident and satisfied… 90% chance of passing this one…
I bet last-year’s AM result looked like a murder scene then! I’m seeing 2015 results with seven bombed AM questions that still passed b/c they had all 70s (or one non-70) in the PM.
I received 8 topics below 50 and 3 in the middle on the AM session but on the PM I scored above 70 in every topic except for ethics below 50 for a band 7 fail in 2015. I honestly didn`t think I did that bad after the exam but I did think it was hard as far as I remember but this time I feel much much better.
It’s not incredible. My buddy who took L3 last year left three ENTIRE AM questions blank. He got all >70 in PM. We talked about it and given his matrix, he thinks he probably got like 6/10 6/6 in PM and 4/10 5/6 (which is like a 93% in PM). Anyway, it seems to be a common story for passers in 2015