See the thing is- You would technically qualify for the “danger zone” category given your occupation and level of implied but unproven hotness but you are totally uninterested in coitus so this shoots you off into the “No Go” zone because that automatically boosts your crazy level whatever the case (damaged goods etc.) I have also done some field research in the study of female CFA candidates and Charterholders from my sample tests 100% have belonged in the “No Go” zone. Apx. 99% from looks and 1% from crazy. Take it as a compliment that you could be that few and proud 1%.
Stripper turned fitness trainer turned CFA candidate. You’re bat sht crazy. its all good though.
I never said I was totally uninterested. I enjoy entertaining the idea and fantasy of it. However, I have recognized that the added reward of actually being sexually active is not worth the risks associated with it. Since I don’t want to be in a relationship and I find I’m not really worse off going without, I choose not to take the risk. Very INTJ analysis 
^The Hitachi Magic Wand takes another one off the market.
LOL, when you put it that way… 
Gosh, that chart was right! Meh, I don’t like unicorns anyway.
unfortunately, everyone doesn’t look as good as I do, so people get hurt