You’re good.
It really make sense now.
Z-spread is 1 interest rate / prepayment ( the actual ) path, which imply zero volatility in the CFs.
OAS add up the interest rate volatility and the impact of this volatility on prepayment , price every path and take the average. this is not really what you will earn, but in average, you should earn that spread. theoretically you will be in one of the path you have simulated and earn that specific path spread.
since Z-spread does not look at influence of the interest rate volatility on the prepayment option, then the diffenrence between those two is the price of the issuer behavior given the interest rate.
i would go further and say that since the z-spread is the base scenario, all simulated scenario with higher interest rate will result in a quite similar spread than the Z spread ( if not the same… maybe less prepayment than expected but very very similar ). and all the simulated scenario with lower interest rate will have lower spread.
So you can easly see that the simulated distribution of the spread will be well skewed to the left of the Z-spread ( mch more scenario with lower spread than the Z spread ). So the difference between the Z spread and average spread in the sim path ( OAS ) really represent the effect of bad scenarios.
So yes, I would prefer to hold a High average spread and a low option cost since this will give me confidence in the certainty of the spread i will earn and a low negative volatility on the spread.
thanks Kedgar