In my opinion, it was not the question, where the question to one part is needed to answer the other part (i.e. it does not contradict the CFAI approach). You can think of it as a substep.
I have seen many questions in practice test, where you could come up with the answer faster, BECAUSE you had calculated one of the components in the past. For example, one question could ask for an equity risk premium, and the other question could ask for expected return where you can use the earlier calculated ERP.
What the CFAI means by independent question, is that the scenarios presented in one question should not be held present when answering other questions (rather those help in the case itself).
I had even seen questions in ethics sections where question 5 could be answered quicker if you recall what the answer to question 1 or 2 was, because there was something in the text early on that had to be taken into account to answer question 5 (not just second to last paragraph as it usually is).
Most of us already know this. We have taken all the same old AM exams. The reason we say this year it was an âoddâ question is because, using your example, itâd be like having to solve for the expected return in question 1 and then question 2 asking for the ERP. Basically the opposite of what you said and seemingly âout of orderâ. Most of us also agree it was fair, just confusing and odd.