Not buying it Yayyy. Listen to Fake Turd, like he said, look within yourself, clear up your lens, open yourself to the Terd.
But if no-one can be right or wrong… how can he be right… the answer… divine inspiration from the light. Check mate agents of darkness.
You didn’t nail the 2016 election call (he did), nor have you had ANY worthwhile analytical insights on anything, ever. So you have earned the right to STFU. 
I always take it very seriously when I get my ass kicked (being wrong as hell), like I was in 2016. So I’m not dumb enough to reject Turd posts, a second time, just cause they sound weird. When you pull them apart analytically (study the above ones), there are many timely insights into what’s happening in the West, intellectual insights grounded in objectively viewing reality. BUT also contradictorily infused with postmodernism (nothing is real, except subjectivism).
Haha nice punchy ending. Too nice, the above names are clueless beyond help.
lol rich coming from the nastiest person on the forum who spends most of his time just putting others down
“But muh feeling, over facts!” postmodernism is your comeback.
It’s analyst forum, you suck and will continue to be objectively judged, the bar will not be lowered (by me).
You don’t have to be an asshole to be an analyst, pa. You don’t need to be an ass to everyone, every day of your life. You can cultivate some basic decent manners in yourself, it is possible.
To liberals, facts, analysis, science, truth is “being an ass”, and “like nazi”. 
I’ve been meaning to mention, I can’t tell birdman/itj/yayy posts apart. I never really know who I am responding too as I can’t differentiate; it’s all the same package of identically inconsistent beliefs that come from corporate media.
I’m curious, which of my liberal beliefs are you referring to?
LMAO. You guys can’t even be real, yet you are. Unbelievable.
Humor me, what liberal beliefs of mine are you referring to?
This is a legit observation so allow me to explain and then I’ll sign off for a while. Post modernism is an intentional b#stardization of heart centered consciousness. Like just about everything, every particular set of principles is always manifested in either a positive or negative ‘polarity’ by individuals using that set of principles to further an agenda. You can look at literally any belief structure and find this, including all religions and economic systems. The important thing to discern is the intent behind the use a a set of principles by an individual. Take those videos by Russell Brand I posted, who I believe has pure intentions even though he doesn’t recognize the nefarious use by others of what he’s espousing. His appearance on Rogan convinced me he has pure intentions and is genuinely interested in positive human evolution, so he incorrectly characterizes himself as post modernist; it’s really heart centered consciousness. The sentiments he expresses in those videos reflect an ideal that we should be trying to evolve towards (tempered by wisdom). However, those sentiments have been taken over by post modernism, which is simply using that set of principles to further an agenda of control over other individuals. It has nothing to do with the ideals they are using. They are a means to an end – using tolerance and emotional vulnerability (i.e. emotion without wisdom) to control everyone.
Personally, I’ve gone through a huge transformation in how i see the world and process information over the last 3 years. I was a hardcore Randian Objectivist previously because I processed information only through my rational mind. Now my consciousness is moving towards a heart-centered way of processing information, which I believe is desirable. It is true that this is a ‘feeling’ based way of processing information. The WISDOM is found in balancing and integrating both ways of processing information and realizing that each is augmented and improved by the other because reality is everything – it is what we can sense or perceive with our rational mind, but that is only a fraction of reality. We know this to be true because we know that we can only perceive a portion of the light and sound spectrum. And science is starting to recognize the unified field concept that connects everything. We can do math in higher dimensions and have a better understanding of the quantum world when we apply higher dimensional math, so it would be irrational to limit your concept of reality to what your senses tell you. And I can say from personal experience, when we let go of limiting beliefs and simply open up to perceiving with our heart center, we get a more integrated view of the world and this makes us happier because we are increasing our understanding of just what the f*ck we’re all doing here.
last one, cuz nobody’s perfect. This is John Kasich saying that the two party political system in the US may be coming to an end. But you already knew that if you’ve been around here for the last year, because someone has said it many times. 
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/25/john-kasich-democrats-republicans-hickenlooper-423456
Just randomly clicked on another page to see if I could find some love. (Shocker, the tweet is deleted)
perfection is unattainable. Conscious evolution is a wave riding an upward spiral, which is to say there are moments of incredible insights followed by moments of low vibration. But at all times evolution continues on its beautiful spiral of ascension and expansion. In the now moment I send you unconditional love untainted by past or future. There is only the now moment.
An actual tweet by the President of the United States at 5:50 am today…
“When a country (USA) is losing many billions of dollars on trade with virtually every country it does business with, trade wars are good, and easy to win. Example, when we are down $100 billion with a certain country and they get cute, don’t trade anymore-we win big. It’s easy!”
Okay, thanks for the explanation.
As you point out—postmodernism has objectives, it doesn’t actually believe what it says it does, the subjectivism is merely a tactic to achieve political ends. You I think have said; you are embracing “right brain” heart/intuition to supplement objectivist thinking, and for very different objectives than PM’s. Makes sense.
Tragic how many people fell for “drain the swamp”. Tragic.
https://theintercept.com/2018/03/02/jared-kushner-real-estate-qatar-blockade/
On the one hand if he had inside knowledge of intent then that’s obviously a problem.
But realistically, this case has been publicly underway for over a year and talked about on virtually every steel related call and industry piece for a year.
On January 11th after a drawn out process and delayed actions, the finally DOC publicly and vocally submitted the recommendations with 3 options including the 25% universal ban to Trump for review and Trump openly stated.
On Feb 13th, this article also ran with Trump publicly stating he was near a 232 decision.
On Feb 23rd (last Friday) this article ran among many others throughout that week with Trump telegraphing exactly this action.
I’m just not sure how any of this is so shocking to markets that were honestly asleep at the wheel on this one.