that Zesty lemon sure is distracting.
I’m not suggesting that we round up all black people. I am saying that if the police have only resources to stop 100 suspicious people, they would catch more criminals by stopping a higher proportion of black people. A traffic stop is just a routine police procedure that every single person here has undergone. If I lived in a bad neighborhood and was not guilty of any crime, I would be relieved by frequent police checks on the population.
Ohai, I’m just saying that this would be unconstitutional. We can’t piss on the constitution whenever it suits us.
No, you specifically noted that it’s a socioeconomic issue and you went on to say “that being said, due to the long history of subjugation; there are more poor blacks than poor whites”.
In other words, blacks commit more crime because they’re poor because Whitey made them poor. It almost seems like a justification for criminality. You’ve failed to adequately explain why, if it’s all Whitey’s fault, Asians actually thrive in our economy and why Africa was and remains unable to thrive. You attribute “exploitation” from centuries ago, but you don’t explain how Africa could be exploited by Europe (i.e. why were Europeans more capable than Africans). You also don’t seem able to explain why Africa is unable to thrive today even though it remains, as you noted, very resource rich.
And “blacks” (plural) is a group. Pick 1000 random blacks and 1000 whites and the group of blacks would have been responsible for a lot more criminal acts than the group of random whites. That doesn’t mean that every person in that group has committed a crime.
The police already stop more black people than non-black people, as the original article in this post describes.
I lol’ed
There, in a sentence, is the rapist mentality.
This data may be inaccurately skewed as well. Anyone with prior history of issues with the law will certainyl get a harsher sentence. You would have to look at only first-time offender stats to be fair.