damn! I f’ed that one up then.
fsa-sucker Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > VROD Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > dealt with whether managers followed published > > styles… > > > Thanks, without giving out too much to ruffle any > feather, can you give any more detail to jog my > memory ? I can’t seem to remember this question. > Thanks anyway. Never mind. I remember that now. Something about one choosing securities and another one managing YC changes.
CFAAtlanta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > oskigo Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > now that i think about it I think i had 5%, -1% > > too. definetly -1. my brain hurts 
> > > was this a question in PM - can you jog my memory > a bit more w/o revealing much? AM Last Question about JPY investor holding EUR and USD portfolios.
l2 - exactly…that was more towards the end…little guys were all grown up
jmychasi Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > not sure what you guys are questioning the two > return calcs…there was definitely two diff > cals required…first one was after the big info > dump, second one was right before retirement. no one is arguing there was a second return question later (either that or am real dumb)). some are saying for the first return question you had to do 2 calculations.
fsa-sucker Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > fsa-sucker Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > VROD Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > dealt with whether managers followed > published > > > styles… > > > > > > Thanks, without giving out too much to ruffle > any > > feather, can you give any more detail to jog my > > memory ? I can’t seem to remember this > question. > > Thanks anyway. > > Never mind. I remember that now. Something about > one choosing securities and another one managing > YC changes. Exactly…
ok, then 1A needs one return only right? later it asked 55 year old return?
PJStyles Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Crossing Network… sure it’s not Principal trade? I think you’d need to use a broker in that situation
I do not remember seeing anything about a 55 year old return. I obviously missed it. How the hell did that happen. Was it on a different page or after they asked about ability to take risk?
right toward the end…was definately there though
LargeMouthBass Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I do not remember seeing anything about a 55 year > old return. I obviously missed it. How the hell > did that happen. Was it on a different page or > after they asked about ability to take risk? hidden, near the end
actuaryalfred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ok, then 1A needs one return only right? later it > asked 55 year old return? Thats what I figured, 2006 exam had a very similar question where part (i) was supposed to be qualitative and (ii) was the next year’s return…
actuaryfred - correct
anyone remember what they got for the 2 return requirements on the 1Q? – I think it was like 7% and 9% or something?
was it market order for the first quick execution, liquid market stock??
i went with market order
Yes, mkt order
i ask again did she inherit 1.5 mil 2 times or 750k two times?
I went with market order too.
Market order 1.5M in two 750K instalments. **THis was not inheritance, this was trust distrubition