75.0% - pass
78% - pass
66% Level 2: Pass Item Set Q# Topic Max Pts <=50% 51%-70% >70% - Alternative Investments 18 * - - - Corporate Finance 36 - - * - Derivatives 36 * - - - Economics 18 * - - - Equity Investments 72 - - * - Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - - * - Financial Statement Analysis 72 - - * - Fixed Income Investments 36 * - - - Portfolio Management 18 * - - - Quantitative Methods 18 - - *
74.0% - pass
69.5 % - Pass
66% Pass
40/60/80 Bayesian Maximum Minimum 66.0% 63.9% 80.8% 53.3% score that matters: Pass from: http://www.manuhack.com/cfamps (I checked the min/max and they jived with my calculations) the minimum is kind of low because I did <=50% on FSA.
Item Set Q# Topic Max Pts <=50% 51%-70% >70% - Alternative Investments 18 - - * - Corporate Finance 36 - - * - Derivatives 36 - - * - Economics 18 - - * - Equity Investments 72 - - * - Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - - * - Financial Statement Analysis 72 - - * - Fixed Income Investments 36 - - * - Portfolio Management 18 - - * - Quantitative Methods 18 - - * 80%, pass…
SkyinBrian521 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 40/60/80 Bayesian Maximum Minimum > 66.0% 63.9% 80.8% 53.3% > > score that matters: Pass > > from: http://www.manuhack.com/cfamps (I checked > the min/max and they jived with my calculations) > > the minimum is kind of low because I did <=50% on > FSA. according to their website, they take the discreteness of points into account so their way of finding max/min is exact. Think about that: if there are 6 questions only and you are in 50-70, the max you got wont be 70, but 4/6 = 66.67%
79% PASS ( I guess 80% is the maximum one score one can get using 40/60/80 method.)
64% PASS Item Set Q# Topic Max Pts <=50% 51%-70% >70% - Alternative Investments 18 - - * - Corporate Finance 36 - * - - Derivatives 36 - * - - Economics 18 - - * - Equity Investments 72 - * - - Ethical & Professional Standards 36 * - - - Financial Statement Analysis 72 - - * - Fixed Income Investments 36 - * - - Portfolio Management 18 - * - - Quantitative Methods 18 - * -
actuaryalfred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > according to their website, they take the > discreteness of points into account so their way > of finding max/min is exact. Think about that: if > there are 6 questions only and you are in 50-70, > the max you got wont be 70, but 4/6 = 66.67% I meant to say that they did appear correct, but of course my minimum was hurt by doing poorly in FSA and having to assume 0 for 24 questions (which is, in theory, possible). If we want to get close to MPS, we need to find some marginal passes without many 70+ and fails with very few in 0-50.
76 - Pass.
65% - Fail. Band 10.
40/60/80 - 77% Bayesian - 79.1% Max - 95% Min - 72.5% Pass
SkyinBrian521 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > actuaryalfred Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > according to their website, they take the > > discreteness of points into account so their > way > > of finding max/min is exact. Think about that: > if > > there are 6 questions only and you are in > 50-70, > > the max you got wont be 70, but 4/6 = 66.67% > > I meant to say that they did appear correct, but > of course my minimum was hurt by doing poorly in > FSA and having to assume 0 for 24 questions (which > is, in theory, possible). > > If we want to get close to MPS, we need to find > some marginal passes without many 70+ and fails > with very few in 0-50. right, I agree that this inverse problem can only be solved with ideal sample points. Otherwise, it’s only a rough estimation. I still think manuhack could give you a big picture.
70% Pass
40/60/80 - Bayesian - Maximum - Minimum 78.0% - 79.7% - 97.5% - 70.8% http://www.manuhack.com/cfamps nice site, thanks for the link smarshy
76%
76% the best thing so far this year