I misread the correlation question. It pays to read the question
dinesh.sundrani Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > tcasperite Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I put PPP > > +1 for me! +1 FOR ME TOO
is that corr = SUM (X-X_)(Y-Y_)/Sqrt (SUM(X-X_)^2)Sqrt (SUM(Y-Y_)^2) = .339 something like that… looks like i didn’t miss any on quant so far…
Hypothesis is < 1 PPP It is an explanatory variable
I had Hypothesis does not equal zero and PPP
H0: b1 >= 0 since he suspect b1 < 0.
lxwqh Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > H0: b1 >= 0 since he suspect b1 < 0. I concur
They were two hypho. tests. my answers First one: Two tail and not = to 0 second one: Less than or equal to 1
McLeod81 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > lxwqh Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > H0: b1 >= 0 since he suspect b1 < 0. > > > I concur Concur on McLeod’s concur.
i had that also so i concur mcleod/mwvt, etc. i think i went 3/6 on quant though- i booted some easy ones. no bueno.
lxwqh Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > H0: b1 >= 0 since he suspect b1 < 0. i think you’re right. It’s tricky. Also get corr= .339
don’t remember the PPP question but rest seems to be right. two tail, >=1, .339
What was the two- tail question?
Type of test to run on a correlation coeff.
isn’t correlation cov of a and b/st dev a * st dev b. it looks like lxwqh didn’t divide the sum of squares and the covariance numerator by number of oberservations. That definitely would change the answer wouldn’t it?
Yes. It would be divide by n-1
I put PPP, 2 tailed t test, corr as .339 something and Ho <=1.
dude, n-1 denominators cancels each other out.
lxwqh Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > dude, n-1 denominators cancels each other out. I had the same answer lxwqh. Thought he was confused by your notation.
i can’t remember the question with one or twon tailed tests