quant

ditchdigger2CFA Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks Dan, read the question too fast and thought > this was similar to another one I did where the > standard error was present. We all do this all the time. Hopefully just in practice!

TheAliMan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > swaptiongamma, danlieb, my quantitatively inclined > friends, I know you remember ;D sf^2 = SEE^2 ( 1 + 1/n + (x - xbar)/[(n -1)*varx]) I tried… dont recall now and this does not sound correct to me - there were many more square terms in there.

sf^2 = SEE^2 ( 1 + 1/n + (x - xbar)^2/[(n -1)*varx]) now it seems correct to me :slight_smile:

how to remember this? Write it down 100 times!

So I was just off by 1 squared term. eeh. 100 times does not work - when you have 30,000 more formulas to remember :frowning: