okay. 1. C. The portfolio as a whole is key here. 2. D. Market expectations. That’s not part of the initial phase. 3. C. Tracking error is a relative risk example and qualitative risk… dunno but doesn’t sound right. 4. C. Ability and Willingness doesn’t match here so that one is incorrect. Can’t find something wrong about the other statement 5. C. Total return. Easy one. 6. Haven’t got a clue. D? I should look this up but I already have this part of the curriculum on my to-do-list.
Haha chrismaths, we look like twins 
Actually, I want to change my last answer to A. IPS is part of planning innit.
Sorry to say, but both of you are all wrong! … wanna try again?
That does make sense.
what, 0/6!?
What what whaaaaaaaaaaaat?
yes 0/6 for both mcpass and chrismaths… But, if you change the last answer to A, then you are 1/6
Okay if you are right I’m afraid I’ll have to jump out of the window right now. What are the answers and explanations?
Well anything else would just be a 1/3 guess. You may as well enlighten us!
The answer is A for all the questions. (A)^6
bollocks fuck and poo poo.
Any explanations? I would have gotten exactly one out of 6!!!
Don’t freak out guys. Ask me anything from what I have not done recently and I will be a sureshot 0/6 on that. Wanna try, shoot me any question on Equities and I will look back with a dumb face. That’s why they say, L2 is a monster.
Stop teasing dinesh, expain!
Here are the explainations Chris. The correct answer was A. Investors, analysts and portfolio managers should analyze the risk-return tradeoff of the portfolio as a whole, not the individual investments in the portfolio. The correct answer was A. Liabilities, long-term wealth target and required spending needs are all direct determinants of an individual investors ability to accept risk. Market expectations will affect return achieved but is not a direct determinant of an investors ability to accept risk. The correct answer was A. The two risk objective measurements are absolute and relative risk. Tracking risk is an example of a relative risk objective. Qualitative risk is a form in which an absolute risk objective may be stated. The correct answer was A. Shins statement that the family has a very substantial ability to assume risk is correct, but he is incorrect to claim that the portfolio should be constructed in accordance with their ability to assume risk without resolving the conflict with their low willingness to assume risk). When the investors ability and willingness to assume risk are in conflict, the curriculum always recommends designing portfolios consistent with the willingness, not ability, to assume risk. Yoo is correct that there is an inconsistency in the stated risk tolerance not increasing the risk of the portfolio above that of interest-bearing bank accounts and the goal of investing in the stock market, and that educating the client is required. Since the willingness to assume risk is inherently in conflict with the stated objective of investing in equities (which cannot duplicate the low risk of interest-bearing bank accounts), there is no way around having to educate the family to resolve the conflict. The correct answer was A. The return objective should be considered from a total return perspective, even if there is a specific income or capital gains target. Desired or required return may be unrealistic given available market conditions or risk tolerance. The correct answer was A. The three integrative steps in the portfolio management process are planning, execution and feedback. Developing an IPS is part of the planning phase.
You screwed with the options! So I got 6/6! In your face! You big bloody tease!
Yeah… the answers are the same as what I explained… instead in your answer key they’re all A. 5/6 … NOW OFF TO BED DINESH! You just crossed the line 
Ohhhhhhh noooooooooo… look at this… straight from QBank. I have no idea how the options interchanged! Yoo Jin, CFA, is the Chief Investment Officer of Park, Kim & Lee Investment Management (PKL), which specializes in private wealth management for affluent families. Yoo has recently met with a potential new client, the Ahn family. PKL was highly recommended by a business associate of eldest member of the family, Ahn Kwan, and three generations of the family are considering investing with the firm to establish a new investment portfolio. The portfolio is intended solely to provide capital for the fourth and youngest generation of the family and their descendents, so the family can maintain its position in future generations. Portfolio income is not currently needed to support the three eldest generations of the Ahn family because the business ventures provide an income sufficient to maintain a luxurious lifestyle. Since the elderly Ahn Kwan is not in sufficiently good health to attend the meeting in person, the family represented at this initial conference by Ahn Kwan’s eldest son, Ahn Yong. He explains to Yoo that the family wants to take a cautious approach to its investments. The family takes substantial risk in its business ventures and does not want to risk its capital. As the discussion proceeds, he informs Yoo that the family is also interested in exploring new investment opportunities for their existing portfolios as well. The three adult generations of the Ahn family have so far kept their money in various bank accounts because of concern about possible losses in the securities market. The accounts generally pay an interest rate between 4% and 5%. Ahn Kwan, however, has been persuaded by his business associate that the family is losing an important opportunity to increase its returns by not investing in the stock market. The Korean equity market soared more than 40% in the previous year, and Ahn Kwan realizes that keeping money in interest-bearing accounts is costing the family substantially in missed opportunities. He has agreed to consider moving a substantial portion of the family’s assets over to PKL since he has been assured that PKL is a responsible, cautious firm. In discussing the move into equities, Ahn Yong explains his father’s position. “My father has devoted his entire life to establishing the success of his family. The financial position of his children, his grandchildren, and their descendants is of primary importance to him. He does not want to risk losing money that he has worked decades for.” Ahn Yong elaborates on his father’s concerns by saying, “My father has seen what happened in Japan. The peak in the Nikkei index came in 1989, and the market has never recovered. Anyone who invested back then lost nearly two-thirds of his money. My father does not want that to happen to our family.” Yoo Jin asks, “We would of course only invest your family’s money in markets that you want to participate in. Would your father want the family’s money invested in the Japanese market?” Ahn Yong asserts emphatically, “My father is only interested in participating in the Korean markets. He does not want our money invested overseas.” The portfolio manager who would be responsible for the Ahn family portfolios is Shin Sun, CFA. In reviewing the meeting with Shin, Yoo explains that in her view, the family’s goals are inconsistent and education is required to resolve the inconsistency. Yoo notes that the family is only interested in investing in the Korean equity market, but the Korean equity market is highly volatile. It would not be possible to create a portfolio consisting solely of Korean equities that would be consistent with Ahn Kwan’s investment risk tolerance. Shin makes the case that the family has a very high risk tolerance. Shin argues, “The time horizon of the Ahn family is virtually infinite, since the money is intended for future generations. In addition, the portfolio has no current income requirements. In this case, they can have a very high risk tolerance. Certainly the Ahn family is in an excellent position to invest in the Korean equity market.” Shin suggests, “Educating a new client can be a very delicate issue. That is especially true when the client is the elderly head of a very successful family. I would not want to tell Ahn Kwan that we cannot do what he wants. We should follow his instructions and invest the family’s money in a portfolio of Korean equities. If that is what he says, then it is our duty to follow his wishes.” Shin concludes that PKL should construct a portfolio consistent with the Ahn family’s substantial ability to assume risk. The best description of the importance of portfolio perspective is that investors, analysts and portfolio managers should analyze the: A) risk-return tradeoff of the portfolio as a whole. B) unsystematic risk of the individual investments in the portfolio. C) risk-return tradeoff of the individual investments in the portfolio. D) systematic risk of the individual investments in the portfolio. The correct answer was A. Investors, analysts and portfolio managers should analyze the risk-return tradeoff of the portfolio as a whole, not the individual investments in the portfolio. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Which of the following is least likely to determine an individual investors ability to accept risk? A) Market expectations. B) Liabilities. C) Long-term wealth target. D) Required spending needs. The correct answer was A. Liabilities, long-term wealth target and required spending needs are all direct determinants of an individual investors ability to accept risk. Market expectations will affect return achieved but is not a direct determinant of an investors ability to accept risk. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The two principal risk objective measurements are best described as: A) absolute risk and relative risk. B) absolute risk and qualitative risk. C) relative risk and tracking risk. D) tracking risk and absolute risk. The correct answer was A. The two risk objective measurements are absolute and relative risk. Tracking risk is an example of a relative risk objective. Qualitative risk is a form in which an absolute risk objective may be stated. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding Shins and Yoos assertions about the familys risk tolerance and the implications for the management of their portfolios: A) Yoos statement is correct; Shins statement is incorrect. B) Yoos statement is incorrect; Shins statement is correct. C) Yoos statement is incorrect; Shins statement is incorrect. D) Yoos statement is correct; Shins statement is correct. The correct answer was A. Shins statement that the family has a very substantial ability to assume risk is correct, but he is incorrect to claim that the portfolio should be constructed in accordance with their ability to assume risk without resolving the conflict with their low willingness to assume risk). When the investors ability and willingness to assume risk are in conflict, the curriculum always recommends designing portfolios consistent with the willingness, not ability, to assume risk. Yoo is correct that there is an inconsistency in the stated risk tolerance not increasing the risk of the portfolio above that of interest-bearing bank accounts and the goal of investing in the stock market, and that educating the client is required. Since the willingness to assume risk is inherently in conflict with the stated objective of investing in equities (which cannot duplicate the low risk of interest-bearing bank accounts), there is no way around having to educate the family to resolve the conflict. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A return objective should best be considered from the perspective of: A) total return. B) return from income relative to return from capital gains. C) desired return. D) required return. The correct answer was A. The return objective should be considered from a total return perspective, even if there is a specific income or capital gains target. Desired or required return may be unrealistic given available market conditions or risk tolerance. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Which is least likely to be considered one of the three integrative steps in the portfolio management process? A) Developing an investment policy statement. B) Planning. C) Execution. D) Feedback. The correct answer was A. The three integrative steps in the portfolio management process are planning, execution and feedback. Developing an IPS is part of the planning phase.
Penance please