^So silly. Trump has not been connected with any of this type of behavior. Hillary has.
No, the issue is that you’re just supposing the accusations are true, even though they’ve been investigated for decades and no conviction has happened, despite the intervening time when Republicans had control of all of Congress and the Presidency, so it’s not like they could have covered it up with governing powers forever.
I’m showing that I can just suppose these kinds of things too, and that when I do it, the personality required to do it fits Trump even better.
con·nect
kəˈnekt/
verb
past tense: connected ; past participle: connected
- bring together or into contact so that a real or notional link is established.
^If you repeat something long enough, it becomes true to Republican voters. Like how Hillary personally caused the Benghazi terror attack and then blamed it on a video because Saudi Arabia paid the Clinton foundation something something.
Gotcha. Like carbon dioxide and global warming. Glad we both agree on that one.
I don’t follow politics as closely as I should, but I have this to say. Issues aside, aren’t most of the despicable things about Trump fact, while most of the despicable things about Hilary speculation?
For Trump, it’s mostly about things that he has said, not really done. For instance, he called Mexican immigrants rapists, but has no real actions in immigration. He is criticized now for making a very misogynistic comment, but it hasn’t been proven that he actually goes around grabbing women by the p. So, criticism levered at Trump tends to be related to his alleged lack of Presidential behavior, rather than his policy history (which is non existent).
^More silliness.
Fig. 1. Global (80S to 80N) Mean TLT Anomaly plotted as a function of time. T_he blue band is the 5% to 95% envelope for the RSS V3.3 MSU/AMSU Temperature uncertainty ensemble. The yellow band is the 5% to 95% range of output from CMIP-5 climate simulations. The mean value of each time series average from 1979-1984 is set to zero so the changes over time can be more easily seen. Note that after 1998, the observations are likely to be below the simulated values, indicating that the simulation as a whole are predicting too much warming. _
^ (to Ohai) And, of course, that has mostly to do with the fact that he has never been an elected official and thus hasn’t had the ability to make policy decisions. Speaking of which, where are those repubs who were banging the table arguing that Obama shouldn’t be elected in 2008 due to lack of political experience?
Ftfy
All the things that Trump has promised are things that he is not going to deliver- similar to the marketing brochures used by Trump university to lure idiots. Example: Building a wall, repealing Nafta, Repealing Obamacare, bringing manufacturing jobs back. These are pipe dreams. He has even pissed off the speaker of the house. His agenda would be ruined on day 1.
Are you aware a wall is already mandated by law? Of course you’re not. Silly question. Sorry.
Horrible emotional temperament… fact
4 (?) bankruptcies… fact
inconsistencies in personal actions vs. policy ( such as tax treatment and using cheap foreign labor) …fact
that’s a few I can think of right now
Any more examples of him following the law? These are great.
Hillary using a private email server also was in line with the law.
Schools must be really weak in St. Louis.
Im not talking about breaking the law Ghibli…I’m talking about reasons one would make a poor choice for president (“despicable things”)
Quite odd that “rule of law” only matters when it favors the candidate you support.
we can argue about who’s going to do the fucking all day long if we want. the bottom line is at the end of the day, the average joe six pack is going to take it in the ass in the next 4 years. who cares if it’s dirty mike or the boyz?
we need a list for Trump vs. Hillary of all the reasons why not to vote for them. Then divide the list into speculation and fact. I would be curious to see the result.