^^^ *sigh*, you guys are probably right. I admit,my view of the current candidates has probably been colored by media created bias. It is so frustrating! I make a solid effort to understand what is going on in the world and at home from sources such a The Economist or Bloomberg. Even so, it seems like I am still mostly in the dark… like I don’t know how the world really works. It’s like you have to devote 10 hours a week of investigation to dig and stay on top of all this crap. I bought up this apathy before when I discussed ZeroHedge. I want to give up, but feel like I should work harder so I can responsibly play my part in democracy.
The fact is Hillary is the best human being, and most experienced person, you’ll ever get. Hillary is way better than 'Mericans deserve, it’s amazing she even puts up with you all. I would have walked out the door a long time ago (and did).
thats what I want to think. However, what if being intelligent and experienced just means she is more likely to pull off shifty, not in our best interest, plots?
Of course, more shifty plots not in your best interest will happen over the next 4-8 years.
But it’s not her pulling off those plots, it’s the LE-AI (legal entity based artificial intelligence). It was not programmed to act in your best interest, and so of course it will not…
I can 100% guarantee that is where you will be. The “shifty plots” will continue, externalities will increase, wealth will concentrate further, and changing “leaders” will alter nothing. Why? Because “leaders” are not in control. What could someone not in control do? Nothing.