# How is the catch-up rate calculated?

Hello,

I dont understand in the Distribution Waterfall Schweser examples why the catch up rates are calculated as the 25% of LP preferred rates. I saw this 25% in two different problems.

This is the problem:

Year1: LP Contributes 50mill. Hurdle is 8%, catch-up is full (100%) and carry split is 80/20.

Year2: Investment is sold for 100mill

LP Ending Balance: -50(Cont) + 50 (ROC) - 4 (50*8% hurdle) + 36 (residual after deducting Catch up) = 40

GP Ending Balance: 1mill (catch up → .25*4 (hurdle) + 9 (20% residual amount because of carry) = 10

Can someone explain where the value of catch up cost come from?

If you're serious about passing the CAIA® exam, get serious instruction with an Online Class.

Share this

# Study together. Pass together.

Join the world's largest online community of CFA, CAIA and FRM candidates.

.Like the example stated above it can be calculated as 0.20/0.80 = 0.25 or 25% based on 20/80 carry split.

Overall, based on a profit of 50 million, GP is entitled to 20% of performance = 10 million.

Hurdle is 8%, from 50 - 54m All goes to LP (principal plus hurdle).

From here onwards will go to GP till full catch up or a 20/80 ratio is recreated.

54 to 55 to GP - Ratio of profit is 20/80 balanced again so full catch up achieved if the profit was only 5.

From here onwards 20/80 sharing.

I think its much tricky if not full catch up but not hoping for that in exams.

Studying With

So we can say that if Catch-up rate is 100% then, catch-up for GP is the split ratio (0.2/0.8)*hurdle earned by LP (if there is enough money in the fund). Am I right?

1. LP get 100% contributed capital first. $50M goes back to LP.

2. $50M to distribute between LP and GP

3. LP get 8% hurdle first, $50M X 8% ==> 4M

4. 100% catch up to GP, what is the number that 80% is $4M? 4M/0.8==> 5M. Why? 80/20 also applies to Catch up, then what is 20% of 5M==> 1$

5. So, LP get $4M and GP get $1M on the cath up.

6. That leave 50M-$5==$45M for final spilt, LP get 0.8X45, GP get 0.2X45

Make sense?

Studying With

Nice work ws. Can you elaborate what would be the calculation if the catch up were 60% instead of 100%?

let us the same example listed out by lbazer.

Since 100% catch up means GP gets $1M, then 60% catch up mean 60%X1M==$ 0.6M

So, LP gets $4M as hurdle rate, GP gets the 60% catch up $0.4M ==> $4.6M

$50-$4.6M=$45.4M available for 80/20 spilt between LP and GP.

Studying With

Thanks ws.

WS, your following explanation is a bit confusing:

“ LP gets $4M as hurdle rate, GP gets the 60% catch up $0.4M ==> $4.6M”

Could you please confirm if my understanding is correct.

@60% catchup,

LP gets $0.6m extra.

So LP = $4m (Hurdle) + $0.6m (from catchup) = $4.6m

GP gets $0.4m (from catchup).

The total share available for 80/20 split between LP and GP is still $50m-$5m=$45m

but LP split: $36m+$4.6m = $40.6m

GP split: $9m + $0.4m = $9.4m

$40.6m + $9.4m = $50m