The problem is easy, I just wanted to verify one thing:
The two reasons it gives for CPPI are
1.) it dynamically provides a floor alue consistent with Kilpatrick’s objectives
2.)When equities are trending up, CPPI will buy equities, constant mix will sell equities, and buy-and-hold will make no transactions. The greater investment in equities with CPPI allows Kilpatrick to minimize exposure to risk-free securities in rising equity markets, consistent with her objectives.
I basically said the same thing #2 did, and also added that the trending market would result in CPPI outperforming due to buying on rises and selling on declines. I didn’t say the floor value thing because I thought buy and hold did that too (just not dynamically) but the question didn’t say Kilpatrick mandated the floor be dynamic. Isn’t the 1st answer inapporpriate in this case? (yes i know i’m overthinking it, but it’s a valid point IMO)
It provides 3 choices: B&H, CM and CPPI 1) the floor will exclude CM. Valid for CPPI and B&H. 2) the trending up is good CPPI 3) minimizing alloc to risk-free securities during rising market is to choose CPPI.
I got your point. 2 and 3 are merged into one, but I think yours is better.
Yah thats basically what I mean, that point 2 and 3 should be separate points, and point 1 should be out since it doesn’t exclude B&H. had they specified “dynamic” then it would be all good.