anyone notice the striking, almost word for word content, of the ADR descriptions in Schweser study guide and Investopedia? http://www.investopedia.com/university/adr/adr1.asp
It’s a pretty good short description. Are you aggravated that Schweser didn’t credit them?
no, just thought it was shady that i paid for schweser when i can just log onto investopedia
I like investopedia - good source for lots of stuff.
I dislike investopedia - I only find what I’m looking for 50% of the time. Well, at least they got the seminal j-lo concept down: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/j/jenniferlopez.asp