Iteracom, I didn’t say you were uncivil. I said you are cynical. And that cynicism showed when you said “who told you that the CFA would be an entry ticket,” which is what you always say when someone asks about CFA (I actually see a thread and start thinking "I wonder how long it will be before iteracom jumps in with the ‘entry ticket’ line). The OP replied along the lines of “I never said I thought it would be a entry ticket,” which - as far as I can see - is also true of many others that you use the “not an entry ticket” line on.
I prefaced my response to the OP with “If you’re sure you want to do investment management…” then “it probably can’t hurt to study the CFA curriculum.” This doesn’t have to mean take all three exams. It doesn’t mean that invesment management has to be for a foundation or hedge fund or whatnot. Maybe it means they will just manage their own portfolio. In this I agree with you.
But seriously, if someone doesn’t have a background in finance, they’re going to sound crazy if they haven’t mastered the vocabulary of investments. What chance do they have? Yes, a little, based on connections and general intelligence, but where are you going to find a structured curriculum of finance basics?
The key is, CFA helps you know more about how to evaluate investments. It’s not everything, and it very likely isn’t going to be enough, but it’s a heck of a lot better than nothing. A key to the CFA decision is: “if you turn out not to get a job, will you think that it was a waste of time going through all those exams.” If you are going to be attentive to your own investments, the knowledge is definitely valuable, but it is a lot of work. It is true that if you knew from the get-go that you wouldn’t be able to turn it into some kind of job, maybe there are other ways to get that kind of knowledge that aren’t so much work, but if you are hoping for some kind of a job, it’s probably a sensible approach.
Ohai did mention an MBA as an alternative, and that that is something to consider. I think Ohai made a good case for MBA as an option. It’s more expensive than the CFA and generally requires you to be a full time student rather than self-study, which is a different cost and dynamic. But MBA programs (at least the good ones) do have built-in networking and recruiting connections which are valuable, so figure out your siduation.
The world’s a tough place and people are fighting each other for scraps of jobs, the way our ancestors fought each other over scraps of meat, and we both agree on that. The answer to the “should I do the CFA” question is: “If you really want to do this kind of work, and you don’t know much about finance, then the CFA is a fairly inexpensive way to get to a minimum level of knowledge that’s required to be in this industry. It’s not going to be enough on it’s own, and it’s going to take a lot of effort, but if you are really motivated to go in this direction, it’s a sensible thing to try. Just realize that you’re going to have to supplement it with a lot of networking, and it might not land anything in your lap, and if you do this, you have to ask yourself if you will think it a waste of time if you don’t end up in the job you are imagining, because that is a definite possibility.”
It’s also quite possible that if the OP isn’t imagining being a master of the universe hedge fund manager, and simply enjoy doing this kind of analysis for a level of compensation that is less than your competition, you may be able to find someone willing to dismiss a high-paid analyst for a lower-paid one. This is one reason many charterholders don’t want more people taking the exam. Also, I suspect that most hedge fund big shots aren’t charterholders (though many of their analysts are, depending on the fund style).