Amortized Cost vs Fair Value of a bond?

I’m sure this is a simple question, but I’m having a hard time understanding the difference between the amortized cost of a bond vs the fair value of a bond. Also, why does a bond’s amortized cost not vary with changes in market interest rate but the fair value does?

Amortized cost is based on the book value on the balance sheet. Fair value equals the remaining cash flows discounted at current market interest rates. The book value recognized for a bond depends on market interest rates at issuance. The amortization of bond premium or discount each period is based on the difference between interest expense and coupon payment during the period.

Don’t you adjust financial assets to reflect changes in price? So the balance sheet should reflect any market price changes?

It depends on how you classify the financial asset.

If you classify a bond as held to maturity, then the value on the balance sheet is amortized cost: original cost with any premium or discount amortized over the remaining time to maturity.

If you classify a bond as available for sale, held for trading, or designated at fair value (fair value through profit and loss), then the value on the balance sheet is the fair market value.