Based on my spreadsheet analysis employing Carlo Monte and Push Factor analysis, I have come up with the following range: Anyone who answered between 46% and 67% correct has a chance. This assumes that the highest score was 95% correct.
There were some dreadful grids that passed last year.
I would be really, really shocked if the highest exam score was 95%. I’d say it’s got to be somewhere between 85% and 90% - there just isn’t any way that someone can completely own that morning exam - no matter how smart you are. my 2 cents.
what do they multiply the highest scores by? .7? i coudl easily see some studs scoring in the 90s.
i sincerely doubt peopled scored >90%. i’d bet good money that we have some of the smartest and most prepared candidates on this board, and every single post i have read indicates that people got owned in the AM section. even with 100% PM score (unlikely), that is less than 90% overall.
just read my another post regarding mps, you will know more
actuaryalfred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > just read my another post regarding mps, you will > know more that post was a fraud.
no it wasn’t, if you follow actuaryfred’s instructions you will find a legit document, that will open your eyes
I doubt alfred’s post was a fraud. The way I use is to go back to the grids people posted on results day last August. There are some really low scores that passed; people with sub-50s on over half the AM and not even close to all 70+s on the PM.
i bet the pass rate this year is much higher than last year because of all the retakers.