CDS CFA Level 3 - Errata on Change in CDS Prices

Taken from the CFA Level 3 Errata Posted April 2022

Synthetic Credit Strategies: Economic Slowdown Scenario
As in the prior example, an active fixed-income manager anticipates an economic slowdown in the next year with a greater adverse impact on lowerrated issuers. The manager chooses a tactical CDX (credit default swap index) strategy combining positions in investment-grade and high-yield CDX contracts to capitalize on this view. The current market information for investment-grade and high-yield CDX contracts is as follows:

CDX Contract Tenor CDS Spread EffSpreadDurCDS
CDX IG Index 5 years 120 bps 4.67
CDX HY Index 5 years 300 bps 4.65

Assume that both CDX contracts have a $10,000,000 notional with premiums paid annually, and that the EffSpreadDurCDS for the CDX IG and CDX HY contracts in one year are 3.78 and 3.76, respectively. We ignore the time value of money for purposes of this example.

  1. Describe the appropriate tactical CDX strategy and calculate the one-year
    return assuming no change in credit spread levels.

  2. Calculate the one-year return on the tactical CDX strategy under an
    economic downturn scenario in which investment-grade credit spreads
    rise by 50% and high-yield credit spreads double.
    Recall from Equation 14 that the price of a CDS contract may be
    approximated as follows:
    CDS Price β‰ˆ 1 + ((Fixed Coupon – CDS Spread) β¨― EffSpreadDurCDS)

Solution to 1:
The investor should initially buy protection on the CDX HY Index and sell protection on the CDX IG Index. Current CDS prices are estimated by multiplying EffSpreadDurCDS by the spread difference from the standard rates of 1% and 5%, respectively:
CDX HY: 109.3 per $100 face value, or 1.093 (= 1 + (5.00% – 3.00%) Γ— 4.65)
CDX IG: 99.066 per $100 face value, or 0.99066 (= 1 + (1.00% – 1.20%) Γ—4.67)

Since the investor is both buying HY protection at a premium to par (that is, agreeing to pay the 5% standard coupon while the underlying CDS spread is 3.00%) and selling IG protection at a discount from par (or agreeing to receive the standard 1.00% while the underlying index spread is 1.20%), the investor will receive an upfront payment for entering both positions as follows:
$1,023,400 = [$10,000,000 Γ— (1.093 – 1)] + [$10,000,000 Γ— (1 – 0.99066)]

In one year, the return is measured by combining the net CDX coupon income or expense with the price appreciation assuming no spread change. As the investor is long CDX HY protection (i.e., pays the 5.00% standard HY coupon) and short CDX IG protection (or receives the standard 1.00% IG coupon), the net annual premium paid by the investor at year end is $400,000 (=$10,000,000 Γ— (5.00% - 1.00%).
The respective CDS prices in one year are as follows:
CDX HY: 107.52 per $100 face value, or 1.0752 (=1 + (2.00% Γ— 3.76))
CDX IG: 99.244 per $100 face value, or 0.99244 (=1 + (βˆ’0.20% Γ— 3.78))

To offset the existing CDX positions in one year, the investor would sell HY protection and buy IG protection. The investor is able to sell HY protection at a premium of 7.52, resulting in a $178,000 gain from the long CDX HY position over one year (1.093 – 1.0752) Γ— $10,000,000).

Since the investor must buy IG protection in one year at a lower discount to par of (1 – 0.99244), it has a $17,800 gain from the CDX IG position (= (0.99244 – 0.99066) Γ— $10,000,000). Subtracting the $400,000 net coupon payment made by the investor results in a one-year loss from the strategy of $204,200 (= $178,000 + $17,800 – $400,000) with constant spreads.

Solution to 2:
Initial CDS prices are derived exactly as in Question 1:
CDX HY: 109.3 per $100 face value, or 1.093 (= 1 + (2.00% Γ— 4.65))
CDX IG: 99.066 per $100 face value, or 0.99066 (= 1 + (–0.2% Γ— 4.67))

In one year, the return is measured by combining the coupon income
with the price appreciation given the rise in the CDX IG spread to 1.80%
(increased by 60 bps) and the CDX HY spread to 6.00% (increased by 300 bps).

In this case, the investor takes the same position to that of Question 1β€”
namely, long CDX HY protection (short risk) and short CDX IG protection
10 (long risk), so the net annual premium paid remains $400,000 (=$10,000,000 Γ— (5.00% – 1.00%).

Respective CDS prices in one year are as follows:
CDX HY: 96.24 per $100 face value, or 0.9624 (=1 + (–1.00% Γ— 3.76))
CDX IG: 96.976 per $100 face value, or 0.96976 (=1 + (–0.80% Γ— 3.78)

When offsetting the transaction in one year, the investor suffers a $209,000 loss from the short CDX IG position ((0.99066 – 0.96976) Γ— –$10,000,000) and benefits from a $1,306,000 gain from offsetting the CDX HY position (1.093 – 0.9624) Γ— $10,000,000). Subtracting the $400,000 net premium paid results in a one-year gain from the strategy of $697,000 (= $1,306,000 – $209,000 - $400,000) under the second scenario.

My Question
Notice in Solution 1, for the HY position (long CDS, with premium) the gains are calculated as Value at T1 - Value at T2 so (1.093 - 1.0752

In solution 2 HY position is calcualted as (Value at T1 - Value at T2)

Solution 1 - Now for IG its Value at T2- Value at T1 (0.99244 – 0.99066)

Solution 2 - Now its Value at T1 - Value at T2 (0.99066 – 0.96976)

Can someone explain why the T1 and T2 are swapped for IG? Its short a discount CDS but I don’t understand how to incorporate it.

Forget the notation and problem solving nuances.
You can present the answer in your format,
When CDS spreads widens, CDS prices fall, buyer gains and vice versa.
You could also solve by presenting CDS spread gain/loss and CDS coupon income separately.
Try arriving at the same answer

1 Like

I have same question. In scenario 1 & 2, There shown the same intention, just to expound any loss or gain if buy/sell CDX in the next year to compare it currently. But in The solution in Scenario 1, seems show the answer for the hedge of foregoing buy/sell CDX.