Mortgage financing can be an attractive strategy to raise funds without loss of control of the property. With a nonrecourse loan the lender’s only recourse is to seize the property if the loan is not paid. The borrower effectively has a put option on the property. If the property value falls below the loan amount, the borrower can default on the loan, keep the loan proceeds, and “put” the property to the lender.
Question: In real world, will dafault the nonrecouse loan trigger other issue? For example, legal or future credit issue…
In CFA curriculum future credit score after executing this “put option” is not even mentioned. Therefore, for the exam purpose, IMO, this is an advantage. In fact, LTV ratio by a financial institution side (as “haircut”) may contain a possibility of execution of such option. Therefore, comparing to other available strategies and personal objectives mortgage financing should be evaluated depending on facts in question.
Do me a favor and Google an article by CNBC called “Full Recourse Loans Won’t Save Canada’s Housing Market.” I think you will find it interesting, especially halfway through and at the end of the read. Just showing how things play out in the real world.