We all know CPPI could outperform C&M in a trending market and offer portfolio with a protection, and vice versa for C&M.
However, what if the question inform us the market is a reversal or volatile, while the customer need us to keep a protection for the portfolio. Which one would you choose?
the point is how could protect your client’s portfolio with a bottum with C&M ,
the protection means even though the equity market is going down to 0, the investor still have a percentage of money, say a floor of 60% of the portfolio, to cover his or her basic needs.
the point is how could protect your client’s portfolio with a bottum with C&M ,
the protection means even though the equity market is going down to 0, the investor still have a percentage of money, say a floor of 60% of the portfolio, to cover his or her basic needs.
Given reversals - you do not need to do anything - it would still be at the original level (or around) and would not incur any transaction costs - so it would outperform the CPPI.
in CPPI----M > 1, here investment in risky assets (equity) is deteremined as per formula = m (Total asset - Floor)
in Both CPPI & B&H----> floor value is the minimum required portfolio value…under CM----floor value is zero
So both CPPI & B&H may work for a client who has expressed protection for portfolio. However CPPI is not appropriate coz market is expected to remain volatile. So B&H
Thanks a lot…that’s really motivating…if you can atleast follow the suit of an expert …but i believe cpk123 (Sir) is by far the best…I am no where on the count…we are lucky to have many more people like him to guide us if we get stuck…almost like an expert…luck has been bit hard on him for sure for the first time…
ATB, we all gonna make it…just keep the ball rolling