I feel that higgmond has done far too much research on exactly when Hillary has to die for various things to happen.
I did assume that Hillary had been elected and then becomes incapacitated, because if Trump wins the election, Hillary’s incapacitation would be pretty irrelevant to what happens on Inauguration Day. And if Hillary becomes incapacitated before Election Day, then I would think the assumption that she would get elected is highly suspect.
Higgs’ info was pretty interesting, though.
I did that 15yrs ago.
You can’t use the machine’s propaganda arm to your advantage. You can’t dig deeper, using it as a source, and find out some truth. Levels upon levels of deception, authored by the highest IQ humans, who serve the machine. As was pointed out earlier, the media already tricked you into trivializing possible real health concerns, with pixel glitch “proof”. Just toss the TV out the window.
How would i watch netflix while laying on the couch comfortably? But yes a TV for actual news has been laughable for a long time.
I like this guy. He’s the Huffpost contributor who was shut down for talking about hillary’s health.
Lots of interesting insider info he talks about on his videos. good stuff:
It was actually prompted a couple of months ago by an email I received that said that Obama had the FBI “clear” Hillary in the email scandal so that she would win the election and then he would make sure she was indicted for the Clinton Foundation scandal before being sworn in, allowing him to issue a presidential order to remain in office since the president-elect was no longer eligible and the vice president-elect wasn’t eligible either because he wouldn’t have been sworn in yet as VP.
well obviously
The fun thing is people who send emails like that get to vote, and their vote counts the same as everyone elses.
I’m not making any sort of statement as to where I stand (mainly cause politics has turned into a giant circus)-- I read these political threads for entertainment…I’ve noticed that you very consistently act as though people on an equal but opposite side are less correct than you are (who knows, they might be). It’s just comical that you attempt to undermine the validity of your equal and opposite counterparts. People on each side tend to see the opposition as illogical or undeserving of serious attention (and we’ve all done things that someone else would find silly).
I do that from time to time admittedly, but I also do enjoy to read legitimate opinions from people on political things. Ghibli and I dont see even on most anything but I enjoy reading his opinions, I enjoy reading TF & Sweeps take on things even though we have differing opinions and I know all those people to be pretty intelligent.
Anyone who seriously believes Obama is going to attempt to circumvent the constitution to stay in office longer, I question their intelligence or motive. Anyone who feels the need to circulate those opinions via a chain/spam email? I know they are an idiot. People who circulate chain emails are idiots. Thats a fact regardless of political leanings.
As a note I would also consider any liberal sending out an email like that saying Bush/Cheney would be trying to do the same running up to the 08 election would be an idiot. Plenty of idiots on both sides of the isle, it certainly isnt limited to any political mindset.
I agree with your approach, there. I think it’s good to have intellectual curiosity and a desire to lock horns with people (in a reasonable setting) to really flesh out ideas and understand where they’re coming from (and even where you’re coming from).
While I don’t think it’s likely that he would, I don’t see it as impossible (simple because he could make it happen). But, surely, you think the same of people (that they’re possibly morons) who believe Hillary doesn’t pose a legitimate threat to the security of our country (through a similar negligence with emails or communication), should she be elected. There’s no reason to believe she would act in a materially different manner as president after already having years of experience in a position of power. As for the “fact” that people who send chain emails are idiots-- I would ask if you can prove that “fact.” I’ve seen many intelligent people (by many different standards) circulate chain emails for many reasons (more often than not because of the comedy value or intrigue rather than belief in the material). Maybe that’s me being picky with words, but there are other ways to get across the same point (without trying to overstate the validity of the statement-- another problem with politics today: candidates are allowed to make such definitive, nice-sounding speeches, but then can back track when questioned on the accuracy of something that was more so a general idea).
Edit: Do you agree that very intelligent people can make irrational decisions based on fear? As we know, emotions aren’t usually rational, but control of emotion isn’t necessarily indicative of intelligence. Many great minds struggled with emotions.
Its probably just differences in using language. Obviously “fact” in that sense is an exaggeration because it could never be proven or disproven. The overwhelming evidence points to it though, although if circulated for comedic purposes it is certainly different.
As for what you pointed to earlier, I have no problems with people questioning HRC as a president and not wanting her to hold the office. There are over 101 completely rational arguments against her and its just frustrating to see such ham fisted ones used and such fear mongering when there are real issues. It reminds me of politicians using the “think of the children!” lines, its just cheap and easy.
Unfortunately, politics seems to be focused around what the people want (entertainment, popularity) rather than what the people need (the real problems addressed). 