Equity Vs Proportionate Consolidation

Why would the shareholder’s equity be same under both the methods?

If assets of the joint venture are added to the BS, then how could equity be the same?

Think of this in the different stages of the investment

  • When initial investment is made
  • How these values change over time
  • Then after 1-year how the values change

Initial Investment

Equity Method = “one line consolidation”

So you are Firm X and you spend $100 buying a 20% interest in Firm A

  • Cash goes down by $100
  • Add a line item in Assets for the investment in Firm A = $100

1-year Later

Firm A reports $150 in total earnings for the year & paid $40 in dividends

  • Firm X adds its earnings pickup to the I/S ( $150 * 20% = $30 )
  • Firm X dividends from Firm A = $8
  • Firm X B/S line item change is then = $100 + $30 - $8 = $122 at year end
  • Firm X total change in retained earnings will be adding their net income (less dividends) to the balance sheet

When you do proportionate consolidation you are allocating your % ownerships of a firm’s assets & liabilities to the balance sheet.

1-year Later

Firm Y invests in Firm B*

* Same $100 amount and 20% ownership

  • Firm Y reports revenue, expenses, etc = their % ownership of Firm B on the I/S
  • Firm Y reports A/R, A/P, LT Debt, Inventory, etc = their % ownership of Firm B on the B/S
  • Firm Y retained earnings change = net income - dividends

Keep this in mind as well.

Net Income = Equity Method = Proportionate Consolidation

Shareholder Equity = Equity Method = Proportionate Consolidation

ROE = same under both

However most other ratios will be different!