Hours put in are a residual effect of one’s ability to grasp the material and understand how to phrase his or her responses efficiently. That being said, I put in probably between 350 and 400, which is more than I put in for 1 and 2 considering it was the final stretch. I felt confident about my AM and this turned out to be true. I found the PM harder than the CFAI mocks that the institute gave out this year. I was scoring above a 70 in all of those and probably got mid 60s on the actual PM this year. Either way, it’s a pass.
I have no idea how many hours I put in – but it was a lot. I started early (August actually), although I did have periods where I only studied minimally.
Since I saw the finish in line in sight and only wanted to go through L3 once, I figured it was better to study too much than too little. If I had to guess, I’d estimate that I put in ~500 hours
Why does everybody starts bashing the guys who are above average? I would understand your responses if he said/implied something like he’s a genius and we all are losers but the dude just mentioned his stats. Outliers will always be there —some extremely good and some extremely bad.
About 250 for me I would guess, I had a lot of interruptions unfortunately (serious family illness, marriage, building a home, prepping for a baby). But those were quality hours and I did practice tests again and again until I was getting 100%. I passed it first attempt, after taking the long road to level 3 if you know what I mean.
Around 400 hours, 1st attempt… I also took a lot of mocks and spent a ton of time reading all the answers that I got wrong to make sure I understood the concepts
About 200 hours, least I spent for any of the levels.
Around 60 hours irfanullah videos. 50 hours practice material. 50 hours of reading the curriculum. and 50 hours of final studies of mostly mock exams and reading up on stuff I failed on in the mocks. Probably can add another 10 on analystforum
No clue. Never saw the point in tracking hours, study until you know the material. What one person can learn in 200 hours does not translate into what the next person can learn in 200 hours.
Probably not knowing how to answer the questions. You should have done 10+ timed morning papers, getting near 100% by the end. If you look at the publically available historic papers, there are definitely trends of what is on the test. Practising exams alone should get you 50-60% without even in depth studying. It can’t be said enough. L3 AM is about practice and how to deliver the answers as expected. I’m not good with details and sure enough, nailed the AM and struggled on PM but still passed. If you can get near 100% on the last several years papers by test day, you’ll be golden.