The CFA curriculum says the following:
The median is the value of the middle item of a set of items that has been sorted into ascending or descending order. In an odd-numbered sample of n items, the median occupies the (n + 1)/2 position. In an even-numbered sample, we define the median as the mean of the values of items occupying the n/2 and (n + 2)/2 positions (the two middle items).
(Institute 220)
Institute, CFA. 2015 CFA Level I Volume 1 Ethical and Professional Standards and Quantitative Methods. Wiley Global Finance, 2014-07-14. VitalBook file.
Call me crazy, but does anyone else see the equivalence between (n + 1)/2 and the mean of n/2 and (n + 2)/2?
Let’s do the math real quick:
Mean of n/2 and (n + 2)/2 = [n/2 + (n + 2)/2]/2 = [n/2 + n/2 + 2/2]/2 = [n + 2/2]/2 = (n + 1)/2
I guess I understand why they have “defined” the median the way they have, but it seems odd that they don’t highlight that the formula/procedure for finding the median is the same for a set w/ an even number of items as it is for one w/ an odd number of items.
Am I missing something?