FT has hit on this in the past and he is spot on. The variation and skew of unique sexual partners is much greater for men than women. Well documented. The top of the heap as had sex with your wives and girlfriends. I’m good friends with a true 1% in the mating game. He went five for five on one vacation, five nights, five different women. Two of the women were engaged twenty somethings, both attorneys from Scottsdale. Definitely 8s or better physically. Be happy they don’t share their number. You don’t want to know. As far as the 1%er, he’s married now with three kids. Has not strayed as far as I know. Judge all you want. His single years were better than yours. And it seems his memories will sustain him. Yours won’t.
Jaysus, is it only this particular sorry corner of the internet that is filled with cynics on another level. I mean we get it, there are golddiggers, opportunists, cheaters etc but if you’re going to recap an anecdote and somehow make a conclusion from that you’d think we could try one with a large enough sample size so that almost 40% aren’t women who run around behind their fiances backs on vacation. FWIW there are no ‘skills’ required to be a ‘player’ apart from social ones and Mr Smart, this isn’t the stone age man, all kinds of guys land chicks.
And sheesh guys, for people who are stating their opinions on male female dynamics with such assertion you’d think we could manage not to drive away the girl who can actually tolerate our BS to post here.
Kr - oh baby, why did you run away? At least give us the map that leads to you-u-u, the map that leads to you-u-u, ain’t nothing we can do-o-o. Oh,oh oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, ah, ah, ah.
On a serious note, why does Wendy post in nonsensical threads about copyright infringement and sexual harassment cases that no one cares about but is nowhere to be seen on serious topics of utmost importance.
You have a lot to learn my friend. The rational animal inside all of us is alive and well. Besides, it is the reason why you’re sitting here on your computer in 2014.
“All kinds of guys” don’t land chicks. The 80%ers that do are cuckold handbags taken advantage of in exchange for once a week sex and a fake orgasm.
It’s not cynical, it’s the truth. And it’s actually a good thing!
IMO its because women play all idealistic, just in it for love, the # doesn’t matter, etc, is because they know that if they WANT to be, they’ll be the more experienced partner. Plus they can maintain that viewpoint, but then sleep with a random guy if they want. YOLO. Men can’t do that because women are the ones that decide if sex will happen.
The last girl I was with, we kinda talked around this and she was like “yeah, as a girl getting sex isn’t hard if thats all you want.” I thought, finally a girl that admits something we all know is true.
What crap is this? You don’t know my past. You don’t know what my memories are. You don’t know what I need to “sustain myself.” Your story was amusing, but your coment on it is simple buffonery that is completely useless as a counter to the quote of mine you were supposedly responding to.
My argument is not about FT’s comment on how the top 20% or top 1% can find people to screw more easily. FT talks about it constantly and I don’t disagree that the top of the male spectrum tends to do disproportionately better.
My argument is about how arithmetic works. If males and females are 50:50 in the population, then the average number of unique MF pairings has to be the same for men as for women. It’s basically the same argument that explains why the average of linear regression residuals is always zero. It’s not that the top 20% of residuals is so much larger that it pulls up the average for all of them. No the average of the residuals is always zero, even though the top 20% is larger than the bottom 80%. So if the average reported men’s number is larger than the average reported women’s number, how does that happen. One answer (the simplest one) is “lying about laying.”
Thinking about my earlier argument, threesomes won’t change this either, because each pair in a threesome counts as a unique MF couple, which adds one to the men’s count and adds one to the women’s count (and the FF pairing or MM pairing is irrelevant here). What may affect the average is disproportional birth rates (more women than men in society), disproportional death rates (some people’s partners aren’t around to give their count), disproportional forgetfulness (people forget some partners in their count), and finally, just regular lying.
bchad, your arguement is perfectly valid in regards to unique partners, but no way in hells MMF is more common than FFM. Trust. Either way, these moresomes don’t happen nearly enough to skew the averages all that much.
Eh, I’ve definitely kicked women out of bed, and they weren’t eating crackers. It’s true that it is easier for a woman to find a guy with no standards than vice versa…but the guy with no standards is probablly not what she’s looking for.
I had a girlfriend in college and we used to have what we called “porn star sex.” I’m sure she had a high number as she spent time traveling around the country in a band. I also doubt that type of sex would have been possible if she didn’t have that number. So many guys want their girl to be a virgin but act like a slut. It’s stupid and makes no sense.
ITT: The amazing revelation that some people have more sex than other people. Unfounded insulting assertions that some dude is sleeping with my wife without my knowledge. Culturally conservative AFers that want to keep the p@ssy in a lock box on a pedastal.