Have a problem with understanding concept in this example
Compute the investment performance of the fund during 2014:
-
On 1.01.2014 , the fund had market value of $100 million
-
During the period, 1.01 to 30.04 , the stocks in the fund showed a capital gain of $10 million
-
On 1.05 the stocks in the fund paid a total dividend of $2 million. All dividens were reinvested in additional shares
-
Because the fund’s performance had been exceptional, institutions invested an additional $20 million in the fund on 1.05 , raising assets under management to $132 million
-
On 31.12 , fund received total dividends of $2.64 million. The fund’s market value on 31.12 , not including $2.64 million in dividends, was $140 million.
And this is how it’s calculated in the book :
-> 1.01 beginning portfolio value = 100 mln
-> 1.05 dividends received before additional investment = 2 mln ending portfolio value = 110 mln hpr1= [2+ (110-100)]/ 100 = 12 % new investment = 20 mln -> 31.12 beginning market value for last 2/3 of year = 132 million dividends received = 2.64 mln ending portfolio value = 140 mln hpr2= [2.64 + (140-132)] / 132 = 8,06 % And my questions: - shouldn’t we calculate the HPR for the period 1.01 to 30.04? - on 1.05 they use $100 mln as the beginning value instead of the $110 mln - why is that ? there was a capital gain of $10 mln during the period 1.01 to 30.04** - how to include the $20 mln investment made on the 1.05 ? it’s not included in calculating the HPR in this period earlier. They use it as the beginning value on the 31.12 - $132 mln**