Doesn’t “Star” imply more, like that people would actually pay money to buy her videos, rather than wait for them to be chopped up into 8:13 minute segments and distributed via free sites?
Mind you, she’s attractive enough that I’d probably notice her in a bar, but she does look more or less like any of the other thousands of 20-something women that banking firms like to hire. Perhaps that’s her appeal.
It’s more that the single video becomes part of a larger collection that people pay to access.
Anyway, most reputable artists in adult entertainment videos look like normal people who are just above average in attractiveness. However, there is a noticeable difference in quality between a big budget production from a major studio and a low budget production shot on someone’s home camera. I don’t know how an actor makes it to the big budget studio in the first place, but one can probably imagine.
On a somewhat related topic, there is some controversy in the greater Philly area because a female pornstar (name escapes me) is donating a couple of signed DVD’s and a Fleshlight to an upcoming charity auction that will benefit the families of local police and firefighters killed in the line of duty. While I appreciate her desire to help deserving families, I think I’m in the camp that finds her donations to be a bit on the inappropriate side.
^Depends on the charity event I suppose. If the crowd is all adults…why not?
A couple years ago, an extremely popular pr0n tube site (don’t want to type it out at the moment), pledged to donate one cent for every view of a “large breast” tagged video during breast cancer awareness month to the Susan G Komen foundation. I forget the exact amount, but they ended up with something like $30-50k they tried to give away and the foundation turned them down. That makes absolutely zero sense to me.