Just want to recommend the practice assessments

[jlion1786]

If you guys did the CFAI EOCS and read through the blue boxes these assesments shouldn’t be so bad… I went through the EOCS and blue boxes again over the last when I came back to these…I found they were just variations of the EOCs…

As long as you know your fundamentals these aren’t too bad.

But I do agree…some of them make you really dig for the information you need which wastes a lot of time and causes a lot fo frustration.

[clangerh]

@shootforthestars1

@lammy

^ Thanks. They might be the same mock provided under 2 different formats (electronic & pdf) but if CFAI was going to offer the same MOCK as PDF too, why not offer all the assessments as PDFS while they were at it?

Haha - like all the other things they do are logical!

Even the freakin currency conventions used are different from how generally traders talk on the phone. Add to that the magical disappearance of (1-t) from Beta adjustment method…whatever that’s called

http://www.analystforum.com/forums/cfa-forums/cfa-level-ii-forum/91342756

[thegeneral101]

damn some of these are HARD!

[jamespeer]

I must say the online practice tests have been excellent. Also delighted to read that the pdf version isn’t an entirely different mock exam! Was getting worried there! I agree the FR&A assessments were tough, and glad there were so many of them as I found there are far fewer EOC questions than in last year’s curriculum for FR&A. I am also worried that the pass rate at 46% last year was relatively high, hoping that doesn’t prompt CFAI to make the exam that bit more difficult!