The footnote on this page states that taxes are igored and the general conclusions remain the same. It seems that this applies for all cases in this reading.
Is this realistic ? Can we always ignore taxes effect in measuring leverages and net incomes ?
Percentage change in Net Income = DFL x Percentage change in Operating Income and Percentage change in Net Income = DTL x Percentage change in the numer of units sold.
DFL : Degree of Financial Leverage DTL : Degree of Total Leverage
Alpha668, the assumption is that income taxes scale nicely with income before tax, i.e. the effective tax rate stays constant. Each additional dollar of income before tax generates the same additional income tax charge. If that is the case, taxes are a variable expense and introduce no additional distortions to leverage (as measured by DFL and DTL).
This will be true in the absence of permanent differences between financial and tax reporting. The deferred tax charge should take care of keeping the effective tax rate nice and stable.
This is somewhat of a simplification, but I don’t think it makes the results in that reading any less viable.