Man sums Trump Phenomenon up perfectly

From

https://www.yahoo.com/politics/nevada-republican-caucuses-results-donald-trump-050344035.html

On Sunday, Ron Vance drove to a parking lot in Pahrump, Nev., a libertarian outpost in the middle of one of the largest and emptiest counties in the United States, to see Cruz speak from the bed of a black pickup truck. Vance was wearing a black-and-orange rugby shirt with the seal of Cruz’s undergraduate alma mater, Princeton, emblazoned on the breast. But Vance wasn’t a Cruz supporter, at least not yet. His favorite candidate, he said, was Trump.

“Why not Cruz?” Vance was asked.

“The whole abortion thing,” said the 59-year-old insurance agent. “A woman gets raped or something, she should be able to get an abortion. The anti-gay thing. I don’t care. If two guys want to get married, two girls, I don’t care. Cruz is against that. Legalizing marijuana, Cruz is against that too. Right now, they’re building seven grow houses around here. I don’t smoke pot. I couldn’t care less. But to me, with ISIS out there, with Syria, North Korea, the economy and jobs … smoking pot is not big on my agenda.”

“Are you concerned that Trump is too extreme to be president?”

“No way,” Vance said. “All he’s doing is throwing fireballs out there to get media attention and to blow up his name. In my heart of hearts, half of that stuff I don’t think he believes in. In his heart of hearts, I think he knows you can’t get 12 million people and round them up. He knows this stuff won’t pass Congress. He just says that. He doesn’t really care. He went to Wharton. He’s very, very smart. He’s a good businessman. He can negotiate. And he’s saying what all of us are thinking.”

“Are you open to being convinced by Cruz today?”

“Yeah,” Vance said. “Of course.”

Vance wasn’t angry. He wasn’t crazy. He wasn’t a bigot. He didn’t hate Muslims or Mexicans. All of the media’s stereotypes about Trump voters? None of that stuff really applied to him. He was just an outspoken guy with a thick Pittsburgh accent who’d never felt at home in either party; he’d voted for Carter, then Reagan, then Bush, then Clinton, then Gore, then Kerry, then McCain, then Romney. His views didn’t fit neatly into either partisan box, so it was hard for him to pick a president on policy alone. To him, personality had come to matter more."

Harvard Prof of political theory:

“Like any number of us raised in the late 20th century, I have spent my life perplexed about exactly how Hitler could have come to power in Germany. Watching Donald Trump’s rise, I now understand. Leave aside whether a direct comparison of Trump to Hitler is accurate. That is not my point. My point rather is about how a demagogic opportunist can exploit a divided country.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/moment-of-truth-we-must-stop-trump/2016/02/21/0172e788-d8a7-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html

To me, the biggest appeal of both Trump and Sanders is that we may eventually get traction from 3rd party candidates. Is that realistic? Who knows. But I can still have hope.

I’ll sum it in one word “F@#king Populism”

Welcome to the politics of the Middle East

And this extreme downside scenario is exactly why limited power of the federal government is essential. fiscal liberals don’t seem to get this. the apparatus that can be used for noble (but misguided) ends is the same means that an evil tryrant can emerge without warning.

Gary Johnson himself even said that he is hoping for a Trump vs. Sanders race. That would be a Libertarian Party dream.

^ The Libertarian party is a waste of time.

^ :frowning: