Multiple immunization

I am finding it difficult understanding why portfolio 2 is the best portfolio to be recommended for the question below. Can any one help.

"Chaopraya estimates the present value of the four future cash flows as $230,372, with a money duration of $2,609,700 and convexity of 135.142. She considers three possible portfolios to immunize the future payments, as presented in Exhibit 2.

Exhibit 2

Data for Bond Portfolios to Immunize Four Annual Contributions

Portfolio 1: MV= $245,178, Cash flow yield= 2.521% , Money duration=2,609,981.00, Convexity= 147.640

Portfolio 2 MV=$248,230 Cash flow yield=2.520%Money duration= 2,609,442.00, Convexity=139.851

Portfolio 3 MV=$251,337, Cash flow yield=2.516% Money duration=2,609,707.00, Convexity= 132.865"

Determine the most appropriate immunization portfolio in Exhibit 2. Justify your decision.

The criteria are:

  • MV of assets ≥ PV of liabilities
  • Money duration of assets ≈ Money duration of liabilities
  • Convexity of assets ≥ Convexity of liabilities, with lower convexity better than higher convexity

Thanks @S2000magician.
So my confusion lies on the money duration bit. The money duration for portfolio 2 ( 2,609,442.00 ) is lower than that of the liability (2,609,700.00). Does it mean that the difference is not material enough?

Exactly.

Lower or higher isn’t the issue.

Close is the issue.

It’s less than a 1-bp difference. That’s really, really close.

1 Like

Thank you so much

My pleasure.