As I stated before, I think DC and Boston are the front runners, but I’m not dismissing a Canadian city. However, I imagine the folks at Amazon know a little bit about negotiating, so even if they’ve already decided on a city it gives them the most leverage to have as many cities as possible responding to the RFP. I wouldn’t dismiss places like Nashville or Charlotte either
^yep read that in an article. amazon basically saying everyone has an equal chance. all lies. they prolly already kno which five they want, and using everyone else as bargaining chips
AMZN doesn’t make a profit nor does it seem to be in a rush to do so. So ironically, corporate taxes may not play that big of a role in their decision making.
when it finally starts making profits, it is better to make those profits in canada. that would be the ultimate dis to the US. grow and become a corporate superpower in the US and then start paying tax somewhere else when profitability finally arrives. haha.
Exactly. I suspect that they have already decided on one or two places. Also, they will not treat the auction process fairly, as they will give a last look to their location of preference. Let’s say they want to have their office in DC. They will call up the DC committee later and give them an offer to match the terms of the other cities. So, 90% of places who are submitting bids are basically “jobbers” or jabronis.
I’d say, don’t underestimate Amazon’s need for cultural fit, lifestyle, and “cool factor” of the city they choose. Their #1 and #2 priorities are probably ability to attract talent optimized for cost, and where their executives lobby to move, even if for personal or subjective reasons. It would not be out of the blue for them to even choose somewhere really expensive, even like NYC, if it gives them a channel to attract the best workers that they want.