Operating cash flow changes - Exp vs capitalising a franchise purchase

hi there is an example given where a purchase is made of a franchise, its stated that the operating cash flow will be higher when the cost is capitalised if it had otherwise been expensed. my question is, isn’t a purchase of a franchise calcified under investing cash flow anyway? thus there is no change made to operating cash flow?

many thanks, this has caused me many issues.

Let’s assume the business paid $300k for the franchise.

If they decide to expense then:

CFO = -300k
CFI = 0

If they decide to capitalize then:

CFO = 0
CFI = -300k

So if you capitalize, the CFO would be higher (0k versus -300k)

hey thanks for your response.

Wouldn’t an investment in a franchise be considered a CFI? Why would an outlay for an investment (i.e franchise) be considered an operation cash flow?

Typically we would classify it as a CFI, but the example is comparing expensing vs capitalizing, so don’t overthink it.

Ah thanks a lot.

I spent the whole day trying to get to the bottom of it.

Much appreciated

1 Like