I used the projected figures too… What did you guys have as the dividend payout ratio for the numerator ? 0.30?
Ozzy05 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > coin/ lag…is right… -1 for me 
comp_sci_kid Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ozzy05 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > coin/ lag…is right… > > -1 for me +1 for me… I gained ground… YAY! lol just kidding… hehe… you’re kicking my butt so far but don’t mind it too much considering who it is
so far i have 1 sure wrong and 2 possible
comp_sci_kid Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > so far i have 1 sure wrong and 2 possible I have a few more than that but probably 5 or less…
comp_sci_kid Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > so far i have 1 sure wrong and 2 possible so good, I have many many possible wrong and many sure
Dietz was 4,1 4,5?
actuaryalfred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > comp_sci_kid Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > so far i have 1 sure wrong and 2 possible > > so good, I have many many possible wrong and many > sure hey, i am only count PM section
enhanced indexing min tracking error, SP100 info not easy => core satellite sounds fishy
for the PE i got 15.8… used 2008 dividends and earnings and calculated the Ke and growth from 2007 figures … since ur projecting what the multiplier would be at end of 2007 D1/E1 divided by k-g
hey for the Japen question, anyone could tell me in the question is it okay to borrow at Singapore rate?
MOPAHT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > My answers.Hope it’s not a violation. Let’s > discuss) > > all beneficiary > wife regular (IPO) > method OK, %% not > %% from debtor - not > CFA ® > decline assets > review quaterly > move trades - OK > keep confidential and dont use > > > > 4,35% taylor > japan > japan > UK > > > > 2224 > 16,3 PE > div Yield > price-down (A) > Core satelite > Strategy OK > all equity stock in index > bias toward growth stock > > > > Buy 5 and 7 zerocoupon 5,8d > > > > Buy OptionDefault Swap > Buy Swaption > > > rebalance - not easy > No lock up,high commision > CTA - correct Correct > Duration 0,95 > Pay 9775000 > Contracts 35 > Notional 208000 > 3 years correct, notional down - OK > breadth - OK, but doubling - not double IR > IR Incorrect > buy IR - 1st the best > (-1 real and 3 misfit > (-0,2 IR > sharp game - 3 (buy OTM calls) > 3 portfolio (D) - cause MBS > contingent yes, cap - no > 12,3% > Diez 4,1 4,5 > > IRR - if bonds with large CF > > private equity exclude, all years - all correct They should pass you just for your incredible memory. This is amazing …
gaming sharpe… wasn’t it selling OTM options???
It was the first fund for sure.
should be selling as it can immediately get you some cash
what about contingent claim and cap on MBS portfolio#3? said yes, no…
for sure. correct. I would say 90% or more of the answers you posted above are correct, I only had some different answers for the ethics questions.
comp_sci_kid Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > L2 Candidate Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > donag Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > for the pe thru earning multiplier… what > did > > u > > > guys get 15.8 or 16.3 and the ratio > > > coincident/lagging > > > > > > Ratio leading to lagging, but not sure. > > > it was B if i recall. It should be leading to > coincedent. I dont remember if i pikced the right > one though the correct one was coincident/lagging I got it wrong by picking coincident/leading
MOPAHT Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > what about contingent claim and cap on MBS > portfolio#3? said yes, no… correct how about confidential information question… i was between terminate and not use nonpublic info but said terminate it!!!
yeah coinident/lagging is correct, no doubt.