brave ones, how can Zeller be a candidate if we have no record that he has registered for level 3…? what am i missing here? many thanks Zeller and Toffler have both passed Level II of the CFA Exam Program. Zeller circulates a resume stating that he is a candidate for the CFA designation and has passed Level II of the CFA Program. Toffler circulates a resume stating that he is a “CFA, Level II.” Which of the following statements are CORRECT: a. Both Zeller and Toffler have violated the Code and Standards. b. Neither Zeller nor Toffler has violated the Code and Standards. c. Only Toffler has violated the Code and Standards. d. Only Zeller has violated the Code and Standards.
You don’t have evidence that he hasn’t either though… and I think assuming he hasn’t is a stronger assumption than that he is. The answer is C?
yes is C. the point in ethics is the “assume or not assume” dilemma that we are always forced to enter…