1 = where they provide you the details of inflows/ outflows -> and ask you to calculate return required for next period … which is the case solved in the book.
2 = where they give you periodic payments over a number of years
PV of portfolio is provided. an Ending Value required after N years, a payment over those N years.
so N is given, PV is given, FV is also given, PMT is provided. Calculate the I/Y.
remember to be consistent with the inflation adjusted or not cashflows for FV, PV and PMT.
remember to be consistent with teh before tax/after tax nature of the cashflows
remember that PV and FV need to have opposite signs.
may make sense to make inflows = Positive, Outflows = Negative consistently.
The text mentions the crossover between the Return objective and Liquidity constraint.
Is it safe then to assume that you will likely find the necessary numerator components (required spending %, spending $, required actuarial rate, etc) to calculate the return in either one of these sections ??
there has been only 1 year in the past 2007 Elizabeth Yao case - where the data was not properly provided and it was confusing. In the recent couple of years the data has been pretty well laid out.